"Eating people is wrong"
About this Quote
Blunt enough to sound like a child’s moral lesson, "Eating people is wrong" lands as adult comedy because of how aggressively it refuses to be interesting. Michael Flanders - best known for musical satire that skewered British good sense - weaponizes understatement here. The line’s laugh comes from its mismatched target: cannibalism is so far beyond the boundaries of polite society that spelling out its wrongness feels absurd, like issuing a stern etiquette note about not detonating a bomb in the sitting room.
That deliberate flatness is the intent. Flanders isn’t debating ethics; he’s parodying the way moral authority often presents itself: simple, declarative, self-satisfied. The subtext is a jab at moralizing that confuses clarity with depth. When you state the obvious in the tone of a public-service announcement, you expose how often "rules" are just social scripts - and how quickly people accept them without asking what happens when the script meets a messier case.
Context matters because Flanders’ era prized the veneer of civility: postwar Britain rebuilding itself on restraint, order, and a certain well-bred earnestness. His comedy frequently smuggled sharp critiques through sing-song reasonableness. This line fits that method: the more calmly it’s delivered, the more it hints at darker human appetites - cruelty, exploitation, predation - being domesticated by tidy language. It’s funny because it’s ridiculous; it’s memorable because it suggests that societies often handle the monstrous not by confronting it, but by filing it under "obviously wrong" and moving on.
That deliberate flatness is the intent. Flanders isn’t debating ethics; he’s parodying the way moral authority often presents itself: simple, declarative, self-satisfied. The subtext is a jab at moralizing that confuses clarity with depth. When you state the obvious in the tone of a public-service announcement, you expose how often "rules" are just social scripts - and how quickly people accept them without asking what happens when the script meets a messier case.
Context matters because Flanders’ era prized the veneer of civility: postwar Britain rebuilding itself on restraint, order, and a certain well-bred earnestness. His comedy frequently smuggled sharp critiques through sing-song reasonableness. This line fits that method: the more calmly it’s delivered, the more it hints at darker human appetites - cruelty, exploitation, predation - being domesticated by tidy language. It’s funny because it’s ridiculous; it’s memorable because it suggests that societies often handle the monstrous not by confronting it, but by filing it under "obviously wrong" and moving on.
Quote Details
| Topic | Dark Humor |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List

