"Eating without conversation is only stoking"
About this Quote
The intent isn’t to romanticize chatter for its own sake; it’s to defend the table as a social technology. Conversation turns consumption into communion, and not in a sentimental way. Talk is where status is negotiated, affection is signaled, grievances are aired safely, jokes become a shared code. Without it, a meal can still be nutritious, but it can’t do the other work meals have always done: binding people into a “we.” Cox implies that the cost of skipping that work is subtle alienation - a home that functions but doesn’t feel inhabited.
Contextually, a writer born in 1925 watched eating rituals shift from formal, face-to-face meals to time-sliced, screen-lit snacking. Her line anticipates the modern scene: everyone technically together, each person elsewhere. It’s also a quiet rebuke to productivity culture, the idea that even dinner should be optimized and completed. Cox argues for inefficiency - lingering, listening, the slow mess of speech - as the difference between living and merely keeping the machine running.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Cox, Marcelene. (2026, January 15). Eating without conversation is only stoking. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/eating-without-conversation-is-only-stoking-163418/
Chicago Style
Cox, Marcelene. "Eating without conversation is only stoking." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/eating-without-conversation-is-only-stoking-163418/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Eating without conversation is only stoking." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/eating-without-conversation-is-only-stoking-163418/. Accessed 13 Feb. 2026.




