"Eclecticism - every truth is so true that any truth must be false"
About this Quote
Bradley’s jab at “Eclecticism” lands like a Victorian mic drop: the problem isn’t that eclectic thinkers collect too many ideas, it’s that they treat truths as souvenirs. If every system yields something that feels compelling in isolation, the eclectic impulse is to declare them all “true” and call that sophistication. Bradley’s line exposes the cheat. When everything counts as truth, truth stops doing its most basic job: ruling things out.
The aphorism is engineered as a paradox to indict a mood rather than a method. “Every truth is so true” mimics the tone of generous-minded pluralism, the kind that nods appreciatively at each doctrine’s internal coherence. Then comes the trapdoor: “that any truth must be false.” Not because truth is impossible, but because mutually incompatible “truths” can’t coexist without someone quietly redefining truth as vibe, insight, or perspective. Bradley is policing a boundary: philosophy isn’t a buffet where contradictions can sit on the same plate without consequence.
Context matters. As a British Idealist, Bradley distrusted the patchwork empiricism and piecemeal theorizing of his day, arguing that reality forms a coherent whole and that partial accounts become distortions when treated as final. His target is the intellectual temperament that prefers reconciliation to rigor, harmony to hard choices. The subtext is pointedly moral: eclecticism can be a kind of cowardice, an allergy to commitment disguised as open-mindedness. Bradley’s cynicism stings because it catches a perennial habit - confusing breadth of sympathy with depth of judgment.
The aphorism is engineered as a paradox to indict a mood rather than a method. “Every truth is so true” mimics the tone of generous-minded pluralism, the kind that nods appreciatively at each doctrine’s internal coherence. Then comes the trapdoor: “that any truth must be false.” Not because truth is impossible, but because mutually incompatible “truths” can’t coexist without someone quietly redefining truth as vibe, insight, or perspective. Bradley is policing a boundary: philosophy isn’t a buffet where contradictions can sit on the same plate without consequence.
Context matters. As a British Idealist, Bradley distrusted the patchwork empiricism and piecemeal theorizing of his day, arguing that reality forms a coherent whole and that partial accounts become distortions when treated as final. His target is the intellectual temperament that prefers reconciliation to rigor, harmony to hard choices. The subtext is pointedly moral: eclecticism can be a kind of cowardice, an allergy to commitment disguised as open-mindedness. Bradley’s cynicism stings because it catches a perennial habit - confusing breadth of sympathy with depth of judgment.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by H. Bradley
Add to List







