"Economic progress, in capitalist society, means turmoil"
About this Quote
Schumpeter’s line is a grenade tossed into capitalism’s favorite self-portrait: smooth upward graphs, steady gains, prosperity as calm. He insists the opposite. Progress doesn’t arrive as a gentle accumulation; it arrives as disruption, as a churn that knocks people, firms, and whole industries off balance. The provocation is that instability isn’t a malfunction of capitalism but its operating system.
The intent is diagnostic, not moralistic. Schumpeter is describing what he later called “creative destruction”: innovation that expands the pie by smashing the old bakery. New technologies, new business models, new ways of organizing work don’t just add options; they rewrite the rules. That rewriting produces winners who scale quickly and losers who disappear quietly or, more often, loudly. “Turmoil” captures the lived experience of that process: job dislocation, regional decline, cultural resentment, boom-and-bust finance, the constant pressure to adapt.
The subtext is a rebuke to two audiences at once. To the romantic defenders of laissez-faire: stop pretending progress is painless or purely meritocratic. To the critics who point to upheaval as proof capitalism is collapsing: upheaval is often capitalism functioning exactly as designed. In Schumpeter’s early-20th-century context, with mass industrialization, monopolies, and political volatility, that claim lands as both explanation and warning. If capitalism demands turbulence to grow, then social peace depends on whether institutions can absorb the shock without turning economic dynamism into political backlash.
The intent is diagnostic, not moralistic. Schumpeter is describing what he later called “creative destruction”: innovation that expands the pie by smashing the old bakery. New technologies, new business models, new ways of organizing work don’t just add options; they rewrite the rules. That rewriting produces winners who scale quickly and losers who disappear quietly or, more often, loudly. “Turmoil” captures the lived experience of that process: job dislocation, regional decline, cultural resentment, boom-and-bust finance, the constant pressure to adapt.
The subtext is a rebuke to two audiences at once. To the romantic defenders of laissez-faire: stop pretending progress is painless or purely meritocratic. To the critics who point to upheaval as proof capitalism is collapsing: upheaval is often capitalism functioning exactly as designed. In Schumpeter’s early-20th-century context, with mass industrialization, monopolies, and political volatility, that claim lands as both explanation and warning. If capitalism demands turbulence to grow, then social peace depends on whether institutions can absorb the shock without turning economic dynamism into political backlash.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Joseph
Add to List
