"Education is the foundation of our society, and we must invest in it to ensure the success of our country in the future"
About this Quote
When Dmitry Medvedev frames education as "the foundation of our society", he’s not just praising schools; he’s staking a claim about what kind of stability Russia should value and who gets to define it. The language is carefully managerial. "Foundation" implies architecture: something engineered from the top down, meant to hold weight, resist shocks, and keep the structure intact. That’s a revealing metaphor coming from a technocratic president whose brand, especially during his presidency, leaned on modernization talk without fundamentally loosening the state’s grip.
The second half does the real work: "we must invest in it". Investment sounds apolitical, almost boring, which is exactly the point. It recasts education spending as prudent national maintenance rather than a moral argument about equality or intellectual freedom. It’s the vocabulary of budgets, efficiency, and future returns. The future, here, is a national asset to be secured, and "success of our country" signals a collective goal that can quietly subordinate individual aspirations. In this framing, education isn’t primarily about cultivating dissenting minds; it’s about producing skilled citizens for a competitive state.
Context matters: Medvedev’s era sat between Putin’s more openly coercive consolidation and the later, harsher turn. Modernization rhetoric offered a palatable story to domestic professionals and foreign observers: Russia would compete through innovation, not just energy and security muscle. The subtext is that education is acceptable, even celebrated, when it serves national strength and system continuity. The dangerous parts of education - autonomy, critique, pluralism - are left politely offstage.
The second half does the real work: "we must invest in it". Investment sounds apolitical, almost boring, which is exactly the point. It recasts education spending as prudent national maintenance rather than a moral argument about equality or intellectual freedom. It’s the vocabulary of budgets, efficiency, and future returns. The future, here, is a national asset to be secured, and "success of our country" signals a collective goal that can quietly subordinate individual aspirations. In this framing, education isn’t primarily about cultivating dissenting minds; it’s about producing skilled citizens for a competitive state.
Context matters: Medvedev’s era sat between Putin’s more openly coercive consolidation and the later, harsher turn. Modernization rhetoric offered a palatable story to domestic professionals and foreign observers: Russia would compete through innovation, not just energy and security muscle. The subtext is that education is acceptable, even celebrated, when it serves national strength and system continuity. The dangerous parts of education - autonomy, critique, pluralism - are left politely offstage.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|
More Quotes by Dmitry
Add to List






