"Effective use of Braille is as important to the blind as independent mobility, knowledge in the use of adaptive technology, and the core belief that equality, opportunity and security are truly possible for all people who are blind"
About this Quote
Braille here isn’t framed as a nostalgic skill or a niche accommodation; it’s positioned as infrastructure for citizenship. Bob Ney’s sentence stacks Braille alongside independent mobility and adaptive technology, then ties all of it to something more volatile than policy: belief. That structure is the tell. He’s not only arguing for a tool, he’s arguing for a mindset shift in how blindness is understood publicly - from a private tragedy managed by caretaking to a condition navigated through competence, access, and rights.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke to the “good enough” standards society often offers blind people: audio-only literacy, piecemeal services, symbolic inclusion. By putting Braille on the same tier as mobility and tech, Ney insists that literacy isn’t optional, and that independence isn’t merely getting by - it’s having the means to read, work, and participate without constant mediation. The word “core” does heavy lifting: it suggests that training and devices alone fail if institutions (schools, employers, government programs) don’t share the premise that blind people are entitled to equal outcomes, not just equal intentions.
Context matters because the line reads like advocacy spoken in legislative air. Politicians tend to praise “opportunity” abstractly; Ney anchors it in specific competencies and supports, translating civil-rights language into actionable priorities. The pairing of practical skills with “security” also signals a broader concern: without literacy and independence, vulnerability increases - economically, socially, even physically. In that sense, the quote is less inspirational than strategic, making Braille a litmus test for whether equality is being practiced or merely promised.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke to the “good enough” standards society often offers blind people: audio-only literacy, piecemeal services, symbolic inclusion. By putting Braille on the same tier as mobility and tech, Ney insists that literacy isn’t optional, and that independence isn’t merely getting by - it’s having the means to read, work, and participate without constant mediation. The word “core” does heavy lifting: it suggests that training and devices alone fail if institutions (schools, employers, government programs) don’t share the premise that blind people are entitled to equal outcomes, not just equal intentions.
Context matters because the line reads like advocacy spoken in legislative air. Politicians tend to praise “opportunity” abstractly; Ney anchors it in specific competencies and supports, translating civil-rights language into actionable priorities. The pairing of practical skills with “security” also signals a broader concern: without literacy and independence, vulnerability increases - economically, socially, even physically. In that sense, the quote is less inspirational than strategic, making Braille a litmus test for whether equality is being practiced or merely promised.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Bob
Add to List
