"Elizabeth Barrett Browning could write a poem two pages long. Could she have brought it to a music publisher?"
About this Quote
Fields lands the punch with a name-drop: Elizabeth Barrett Browning, the high priestess of serious, book-length feeling, gets held up against the blunt economics of Tin Pan Alley. The joke isn’t that Browning lacked talent; it’s that “talent” is the wrong currency in a business built around sellable units. Two pages of poetry reads like grandeur. Two pages of lyrics looks like a problem.
The intent is both defense and critique. Fields is implicitly arguing for the craft of the popular song, where compression isn’t a concession but the whole game: character, plot, hook, and heartbreak inside a structure a band can play and an audience can remember on the walk home. At the same time, she’s skewering the gatekeepers who treat art as inventory. “Could she have brought it to a music publisher?” isn’t a question about aesthetics; it’s about whether the system can even process work that doesn’t fit its formats.
Subtext: the songwriter’s perpetual double bind. If you write too “literary,” you’re impractical. If you write too cleanly for commerce, you’re dismissed as lightweight. Fields, a woman who thrived in an industry that often trivialized what women wrote and performed, flips the hierarchy. She doesn’t beg poetry for validation; she dares poetry to survive the marketplace test she knows intimately.
Context matters: Fields wrote in an era when songs were manufactured for Broadway, film, and radio, where publishers, performers, and runtime limits ruled. Her line is a sly professional flex: art isn’t only what you can feel; it’s what you can deliver.
The intent is both defense and critique. Fields is implicitly arguing for the craft of the popular song, where compression isn’t a concession but the whole game: character, plot, hook, and heartbreak inside a structure a band can play and an audience can remember on the walk home. At the same time, she’s skewering the gatekeepers who treat art as inventory. “Could she have brought it to a music publisher?” isn’t a question about aesthetics; it’s about whether the system can even process work that doesn’t fit its formats.
Subtext: the songwriter’s perpetual double bind. If you write too “literary,” you’re impractical. If you write too cleanly for commerce, you’re dismissed as lightweight. Fields, a woman who thrived in an industry that often trivialized what women wrote and performed, flips the hierarchy. She doesn’t beg poetry for validation; she dares poetry to survive the marketplace test she knows intimately.
Context matters: Fields wrote in an era when songs were manufactured for Broadway, film, and radio, where publishers, performers, and runtime limits ruled. Her line is a sly professional flex: art isn’t only what you can feel; it’s what you can deliver.
Quote Details
| Topic | Poetry |
|---|
More Quotes by Dorothy
Add to List
