"Entrenched bureaucracies are always opposed to fundamental changes"
About this Quote
Dodd’s line is a politician’s truth-telling that doubles as a preemptive excuse. “Entrenched bureaucracies” isn’t just a description; it’s a cast of characters: faceless agencies, career staff, and procedural chokepoints that can be blamed without naming a single enemy. The word “entrenched” does the heavy lifting, implying not mere caution but a dug-in defensive posture. It frames resistance as structural, almost geological, rather than a debate over whether a given reform is smart.
The intent is tactical. By asserting that bureaucracies are “always opposed,” Dodd turns predictable friction into proof that change is real. If you meet resistance, that’s not a sign your plan is flawed; it’s confirmation you’ve challenged the system. It’s a useful bit of rhetoric for selling reform to voters who suspect government can’t move fast, and for rallying allies who will have to endure slow, procedural fights.
The subtext also flatters the speaker’s side. “Fundamental changes” positions the reformer as courageous and visionary, while the bureaucracy becomes the timid status quo. It’s a simplification that skips over an inconvenient fact: bureaucracies sometimes resist because they remember the last reform that sounded transformational and landed as an unfunded mandate, a half-built IT system, or a policy boomerang.
Contextually, this fits the late-20th/early-21st century American reform script: ambitious legislation meets institutional inertia, and elected officials narrate the grind as a morality play. Dodd’s sentence works because it translates messy governance into a clear antagonist, giving reform a storyline voters can follow.
The intent is tactical. By asserting that bureaucracies are “always opposed,” Dodd turns predictable friction into proof that change is real. If you meet resistance, that’s not a sign your plan is flawed; it’s confirmation you’ve challenged the system. It’s a useful bit of rhetoric for selling reform to voters who suspect government can’t move fast, and for rallying allies who will have to endure slow, procedural fights.
The subtext also flatters the speaker’s side. “Fundamental changes” positions the reformer as courageous and visionary, while the bureaucracy becomes the timid status quo. It’s a simplification that skips over an inconvenient fact: bureaucracies sometimes resist because they remember the last reform that sounded transformational and landed as an unfunded mandate, a half-built IT system, or a policy boomerang.
Contextually, this fits the late-20th/early-21st century American reform script: ambitious legislation meets institutional inertia, and elected officials narrate the grind as a morality play. Dodd’s sentence works because it translates messy governance into a clear antagonist, giving reform a storyline voters can follow.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Christopher
Add to List
