"Errors of taste are very often the outward sign of a deep fault of sensibility"
About this Quote
Taste gets dismissed as snobbery until someone points out what it really is: a moral and emotional instrument panel. Jonathan Miller’s line lands because it refuses the comforting idea that “bad taste” is just harmless preference. He treats aesthetic choices as symptoms, not quirks, and the word “outward” does quiet but crucial work. Taste is the visible surface where private sensibility leaks into public life: what you laugh at, what you tolerate, what you call “just a joke,” what you frame as “edgy” rather than cruel.
Miller, an entertainer with a clinician’s eye, is less interested in policing style than in diagnosing perception. “Errors of taste” aren’t simply the wrong fork at dinner; they’re the joke that punches down, the sentimental manipulation that mistakes emotion for truth, the kitsch that anesthetizes complexity into comfort. The subtext is unsettling: if your tastes repeatedly gravitate toward the cheap, the contemptuous, the dehumanizing, that’s not neutral. It suggests a compromised capacity to feel accurately - to register nuance, empathy, proportion.
Context matters because Miller moved across comedy, theater, and cultural criticism, worlds where “taste” is both currency and battleground. He knew how quickly audiences defend their preferences as identity. The sentence is a rebuke to that defense. It implies accountability: sensibility can be cultivated or damaged, and taste is one of the few places where that inner condition becomes legible. In an era that treats curation as personality, Miller’s point bites harder: your aesthetic isn’t merely what you like; it’s how you see.
Miller, an entertainer with a clinician’s eye, is less interested in policing style than in diagnosing perception. “Errors of taste” aren’t simply the wrong fork at dinner; they’re the joke that punches down, the sentimental manipulation that mistakes emotion for truth, the kitsch that anesthetizes complexity into comfort. The subtext is unsettling: if your tastes repeatedly gravitate toward the cheap, the contemptuous, the dehumanizing, that’s not neutral. It suggests a compromised capacity to feel accurately - to register nuance, empathy, proportion.
Context matters because Miller moved across comedy, theater, and cultural criticism, worlds where “taste” is both currency and battleground. He knew how quickly audiences defend their preferences as identity. The sentence is a rebuke to that defense. It implies accountability: sensibility can be cultivated or damaged, and taste is one of the few places where that inner condition becomes legible. In an era that treats curation as personality, Miller’s point bites harder: your aesthetic isn’t merely what you like; it’s how you see.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Jonathan
Add to List







