"Europe cannot survive another world war"
About this Quote
A sentence like "Europe cannot survive another world war" isn’t prediction so much as political leverage: it turns recent trauma into a mandate. Christian Lous Lange, a Norwegian politician and Nobel Peace Prize laureate associated with early internationalist movements, speaks from the thin, bruised margin between World War I’s aftermath and the gathering storms of the 1930s. The line works because it refuses the comforting idea that catastrophe is survivable by default. “Cannot” is doing the heavy lifting: not “shouldn’t,” not “must avoid,” but a hard limit, as if the continent’s moral credit and material infrastructure have been spent.
The subtext is aimed at Europe’s elite complacency. After 1918, Europe didn’t just tally its dead; it inherited debt, displaced populations, extremist politics, and a brittle peace architecture that depended on cooperation from states that increasingly resented it. Lange’s phrasing compresses all that into a single, blunt ultimatum: the next war won’t be a tragic repeat, it will be a civilizational unmaking. It’s an argument against nationalism framed in the only language nationalists claim to respect: survival.
Context sharpens the intent. Interwar diplomacy often sounded like sermonizing to publics exhausted by slogans; Lange’s line avoids moral grandstanding and instead offers a stark cost-benefit calculation. If 1914-18 was “the war to end war,” then this is the correction: wars don’t end themselves. Institutions, treaties, and restraint do. By casting another war as existential, Lange tries to make peace not a virtue but a necessity no responsible state can afford to romanticize away.
The subtext is aimed at Europe’s elite complacency. After 1918, Europe didn’t just tally its dead; it inherited debt, displaced populations, extremist politics, and a brittle peace architecture that depended on cooperation from states that increasingly resented it. Lange’s phrasing compresses all that into a single, blunt ultimatum: the next war won’t be a tragic repeat, it will be a civilizational unmaking. It’s an argument against nationalism framed in the only language nationalists claim to respect: survival.
Context sharpens the intent. Interwar diplomacy often sounded like sermonizing to publics exhausted by slogans; Lange’s line avoids moral grandstanding and instead offers a stark cost-benefit calculation. If 1914-18 was “the war to end war,” then this is the correction: wars don’t end themselves. Institutions, treaties, and restraint do. By casting another war as existential, Lange tries to make peace not a virtue but a necessity no responsible state can afford to romanticize away.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Christian
Add to List
