"Even in a less exaggerated description, any verbal account of a person is bound to find itself employing an assortment of waterfalls, lightning rods, landscapes, birds, etc"
About this Quote
Trying to pin a person down in words, Eisenstein argues, you end up smuggling in a whole weather system. “Waterfalls, lightning rods, landscapes, birds” isn’t decorative flourish; it’s a confession about representation. The moment you describe someone, you start borrowing the world’s textures to do the work your language can’t: intensity becomes thunder, grace becomes flight, grief becomes a flooded riverbank. Even a “less exaggerated” account can’t avoid metaphor, because character isn’t a checklist of traits. It’s felt, paced, and perceived.
That’s a director talking. Eisenstein’s films and theories (especially his montage thinking) treat meaning as something generated by collision: image against image, detail against detail, the audience assembling a third thing in their head. Here he’s pointing out that prose does the same, just more covertly. A “verbal account” pretends to be direct, but it’s inevitably built from cinematic props: natural forces and visual shorthand that let us compress a complicated human into graspable cues. The subtext is almost a challenge to realism’s self-image. So-called plain description is already stylized; it’s already editing.
There’s also a quiet skepticism about biography and portraiture: the closer you claim to get to “the person,” the more you reveal the storyteller’s tool kit and biases. Which metaphors you reach for - waterfalls versus lightning rods - exposes not just who they are, but how you’re choosing to see them. Eisenstein isn’t dismissing language; he’s reminding us it’s always staging.
That’s a director talking. Eisenstein’s films and theories (especially his montage thinking) treat meaning as something generated by collision: image against image, detail against detail, the audience assembling a third thing in their head. Here he’s pointing out that prose does the same, just more covertly. A “verbal account” pretends to be direct, but it’s inevitably built from cinematic props: natural forces and visual shorthand that let us compress a complicated human into graspable cues. The subtext is almost a challenge to realism’s self-image. So-called plain description is already stylized; it’s already editing.
There’s also a quiet skepticism about biography and portraiture: the closer you claim to get to “the person,” the more you reveal the storyteller’s tool kit and biases. Which metaphors you reach for - waterfalls versus lightning rods - exposes not just who they are, but how you’re choosing to see them. Eisenstein isn’t dismissing language; he’s reminding us it’s always staging.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Sergei
Add to List








