"Even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich"
About this Quote
There is a cold, ledger-like brutality in Bryant's choice to anchor Nazi persecution to a property share. "Even in November 1938" is a time stamp that lands like an accusation: after half a decade of legal strangulation, the fact that German Jews "still owned" a third of the Reich's real property (as reported by a Times correspondent) reads less as reassurance than as the pretext history repeatedly uses to rationalize theft. The sentence performs the same pivot the regime perfected: turn a targeted minority into an economic abstraction, then treat redistribution as administrative necessity.
The context is the cusp of Kristallnacht, when violence was both spectacle and policy. Bryant's mention of "anti-Semitic legislation and persecution" reminds you that dispossession preceded broken glass; the law had been quietly preparing the moral alibi. By invoking a mainstream British newspaper from Berlin, Bryant borrows contemporaneous credibility while also indicting how the outside world processed warning signs: through statistics, not urgency.
Subtextually, the line exposes how envy and "fairness" rhetoric get weaponized. The implication is that ownership itself becomes a provocation - not because it is illicit, but because it can be made to look excessive. Bryant is not celebrating Jewish wealth; he's showing how a number can be turned into a justification, how modern hatred prefers balance sheets to bloodlust. The intent is to make readers feel the chill of bureaucratized prejudice: persecution that can be narrated as economics, and therefore too easily tolerated until it becomes irreversible.
The context is the cusp of Kristallnacht, when violence was both spectacle and policy. Bryant's mention of "anti-Semitic legislation and persecution" reminds you that dispossession preceded broken glass; the law had been quietly preparing the moral alibi. By invoking a mainstream British newspaper from Berlin, Bryant borrows contemporaneous credibility while also indicting how the outside world processed warning signs: through statistics, not urgency.
Subtextually, the line exposes how envy and "fairness" rhetoric get weaponized. The implication is that ownership itself becomes a provocation - not because it is illicit, but because it can be made to look excessive. Bryant is not celebrating Jewish wealth; he's showing how a number can be turned into a justification, how modern hatred prefers balance sheets to bloodlust. The intent is to make readers feel the chill of bureaucratized prejudice: persecution that can be narrated as economics, and therefore too easily tolerated until it becomes irreversible.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List




