"Even though Rush is not me and the situations were very different, I think, in the Rush Limbaugh thing, ESPN was criticized for not acting, and you remember that after a couple days of controversy over Rush"
About this Quote
Easterbrook’s sentence is a preemptive self-defense masquerading as institutional critique: “Rush is not me” is less a clarification than a throat-clearing ritual for anyone about to mention Rush Limbaugh without wanting the stink to linger. The line knows the accusation before it lands. He’s anticipating the most predictable cultural script in modern media scandals: the demand that employers move fast, publicly, and performatively, or be accused of complicity.
The intent is twofold. First, he tries to separate his own alleged offense from Limbaugh’s, not on moral grounds but on “situations were very different,” a lawyerly appeal to particulars. Second, he pressures ESPN by invoking its prior humiliation: the network was “criticized for not acting.” That’s the real leverage. He’s reminding ESPN that the audience and the press have already trained them once. The subtext is essentially: you don’t want to be the company that hesitates again.
Contextually, this is a snapshot of the post-outrage media ecosystem where timing becomes a kind of ethics. “After a couple days of controversy” reads like a ticking clock, implying that deliberation itself is a failure. Easterbrook isn’t arguing innocence so much as narrating an expectation: institutions don’t adjudicate; they manage backlash. The reference to “the Rush Limbaugh thing” functions as shorthand for a whole cycle - comment, outrage, sponsor pressure, corporate action - and he’s positioning himself inside that machinery, hoping it grinds in a different direction.
The intent is twofold. First, he tries to separate his own alleged offense from Limbaugh’s, not on moral grounds but on “situations were very different,” a lawyerly appeal to particulars. Second, he pressures ESPN by invoking its prior humiliation: the network was “criticized for not acting.” That’s the real leverage. He’s reminding ESPN that the audience and the press have already trained them once. The subtext is essentially: you don’t want to be the company that hesitates again.
Contextually, this is a snapshot of the post-outrage media ecosystem where timing becomes a kind of ethics. “After a couple days of controversy” reads like a ticking clock, implying that deliberation itself is a failure. Easterbrook isn’t arguing innocence so much as narrating an expectation: institutions don’t adjudicate; they manage backlash. The reference to “the Rush Limbaugh thing” functions as shorthand for a whole cycle - comment, outrage, sponsor pressure, corporate action - and he’s positioning himself inside that machinery, hoping it grinds in a different direction.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Gregg
Add to List
