"Every acquisition of accommodation becomes material for assimilation, but assimilation always resists new accommodations"
About this Quote
Piaget captures the push-pull of learning: as soon as we stretch our mental models to accommodate something new, that very stretch becomes material for future understanding; yet the mind prefers to fit incoming experience into existing patterns, resisting further structural change. He called these two processes accommodation and assimilation. Assimilation absorbs new information into current schemas; accommodation alters those schemas when assimilation no longer works. Learning advances through their interplay, driven by a search for equilibrium between what fits and what must be revised.
A child who calls every four-legged creature a dog is assimilating. Meeting a cat that does not behave like a dog eventually forces accommodation, splitting the schema into dog and cat. Once that adjustment is made, it becomes a tool for further assimilation: new cats now slot neatly into the revised category. But when the child encounters a fox or a bat, the mind again tries to conserve effort by assimilating first, resisting the costlier work of restructuring. That resistance is not mere stubbornness; it protects coherence, efficiency, and the ability to predict, just as a living system maintains homeostasis unless perturbations demand change.
Piaget’s line also illuminates why misconceptions in science or entrenched beliefs in adulthood are so durable. Existing frameworks eagerly digest supportive data and reinterpret anomalies, delaying accommodation until contradictions accumulate. Conceptual change requires productive disequilibrium: tasks and evidence that stretch schemas just enough to make revision necessary but not so much as to overwhelm. Effective teaching, parenting, and leadership orchestrate this balance, offering scaffolds that help people convert temporary accommodation into stable structures for future assimilation.
The rhythm is dialectical. Growth uses the inertia of assimilation to stabilize gains and the disruptive power of accommodation to open new possibilities. Understanding that dual movement explains both the pace of cognitive development and the strategic design of environments that help minds truly change.
A child who calls every four-legged creature a dog is assimilating. Meeting a cat that does not behave like a dog eventually forces accommodation, splitting the schema into dog and cat. Once that adjustment is made, it becomes a tool for further assimilation: new cats now slot neatly into the revised category. But when the child encounters a fox or a bat, the mind again tries to conserve effort by assimilating first, resisting the costlier work of restructuring. That resistance is not mere stubbornness; it protects coherence, efficiency, and the ability to predict, just as a living system maintains homeostasis unless perturbations demand change.
Piaget’s line also illuminates why misconceptions in science or entrenched beliefs in adulthood are so durable. Existing frameworks eagerly digest supportive data and reinterpret anomalies, delaying accommodation until contradictions accumulate. Conceptual change requires productive disequilibrium: tasks and evidence that stretch schemas just enough to make revision necessary but not so much as to overwhelm. Effective teaching, parenting, and leadership orchestrate this balance, offering scaffolds that help people convert temporary accommodation into stable structures for future assimilation.
The rhythm is dialectical. Growth uses the inertia of assimilation to stabilize gains and the disruptive power of accommodation to open new possibilities. Understanding that dual movement explains both the pace of cognitive development and the strategic design of environments that help minds truly change.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|
More Quotes by Jean
Add to List
