"Every chemical reaction has a transition state"
About this Quote
A line like this sounds like dry textbook boilerplate until you remember who’s saying it: Derek Barton, a chemist who helped make “molecular shape matters” into an organizing principle rather than a footnote. “Every chemical reaction has a transition state” is less a factoid than a disciplinary dare. It’s Barton insisting that chemistry isn’t magic and it isn’t just bookkeeping of reactants and products; the real drama happens in the precarious, high-energy instant you can’t isolate in a bottle but can still reason about, model, and ultimately exploit.
The intent is methodological. By declaring the transition state universal, Barton pushes chemists away from descriptive empiricism (“it works”) toward mechanistic accountability (“how, exactly, does it work?”). The subtext is a quiet rebuke to hand-wavy explanations: if you can’t propose a plausible transition state, you don’t yet understand the reaction. It’s also an invitation to creativity under constraint. Transition-state thinking turns synthesis into strategy: stabilize the right fleeting geometry, and you can steer outcomes, explain selectivity, design catalysts, and predict side reactions instead of merely discovering them the hard way.
Context matters: mid-20th-century organic chemistry was becoming theory-literate, with conformational analysis and physical organic tools reshaping the field. Barton’s sentence functions like a lodestar for that shift. It elevates the invisible to the central object of inquiry, making the “between” state not an afterthought but the place where chemical intelligence lives.
The intent is methodological. By declaring the transition state universal, Barton pushes chemists away from descriptive empiricism (“it works”) toward mechanistic accountability (“how, exactly, does it work?”). The subtext is a quiet rebuke to hand-wavy explanations: if you can’t propose a plausible transition state, you don’t yet understand the reaction. It’s also an invitation to creativity under constraint. Transition-state thinking turns synthesis into strategy: stabilize the right fleeting geometry, and you can steer outcomes, explain selectivity, design catalysts, and predict side reactions instead of merely discovering them the hard way.
Context matters: mid-20th-century organic chemistry was becoming theory-literate, with conformational analysis and physical organic tools reshaping the field. Barton’s sentence functions like a lodestar for that shift. It elevates the invisible to the central object of inquiry, making the “between” state not an afterthought but the place where chemical intelligence lives.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Derek
Add to List






