"Every day we do get closer to a cure. Three out of four children who are diagnosed with cancer will survive the disease, but that is not good enough. The loss of one child to this disease is too much"
About this Quote
Progress is framed here as both promise and indictment: “Every day we do get closer to a cure” offers the comfort of motion, but it also implies a moral clock ticking while children die on our watch. McCaul’s line works because it refuses to let improved survival rates become a victory lap. The statistic, “three out of four,” is deployed like a baited hook for complacency; he immediately yanks it away with “but that is not good enough,” converting optimism into obligation.
The subtext is political in the cleanest sense: this is an argument for sustained public investment - in research funding, clinical trials, drug development incentives, and the bureaucratic infrastructure that makes treatments reachable, not just theoretically possible. By anchoring the case in children, the quote strategically narrows the moral field. Pediatric cancer is rhetorically powerful because it short-circuits the usual debates about personal responsibility, lifestyle, or deservedness. A sick child is the one patient category Americans almost universally agree should never be rationed by cost, insurance networks, or partisan grudges.
“The loss of one child…is too much” is deliberately absolute, a refusal of utilitarian arithmetic. It’s also a permission slip for ambition: if one death is unacceptable, then incrementalism starts to look like complicity. McCaul isn’t claiming we can eliminate all tragedy tomorrow; he’s asserting that a wealthy, scientifically advanced country should treat preventable child deaths as a policy failure, not an inevitability.
The subtext is political in the cleanest sense: this is an argument for sustained public investment - in research funding, clinical trials, drug development incentives, and the bureaucratic infrastructure that makes treatments reachable, not just theoretically possible. By anchoring the case in children, the quote strategically narrows the moral field. Pediatric cancer is rhetorically powerful because it short-circuits the usual debates about personal responsibility, lifestyle, or deservedness. A sick child is the one patient category Americans almost universally agree should never be rationed by cost, insurance networks, or partisan grudges.
“The loss of one child…is too much” is deliberately absolute, a refusal of utilitarian arithmetic. It’s also a permission slip for ambition: if one death is unacceptable, then incrementalism starts to look like complicity. McCaul isn’t claiming we can eliminate all tragedy tomorrow; he’s asserting that a wealthy, scientifically advanced country should treat preventable child deaths as a policy failure, not an inevitability.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List




