"Every library should try to be complete on something, if it were only the history of pinheads"
About this Quote
A perfect Victorian needle: it pricks the ego of any institution that confuses bigness with value. Holmes, a poet-physician with a knack for urbane mischief, frames “Every library should try to be complete on something” as sober advice, then detonates it with the punchline “if it were only the history of pinheads.” The joke isn’t that pinheads are silly; it’s that most collections, like most people, quietly believe their interests are exempt from silliness.
The intent is corrective. Holmes is pushing back on the fantasy of the “universal” library - the grand civic warehouse that pretends it can hold all knowledge with equal seriousness. Completeness, he implies, is a discipline, not a boast: pick a lane, go deep, be authoritative. The pinheads jab exposes a second target: prestige. Libraries (and the donors who love them) gravitate toward canonical subjects that signal refinement. Holmes flips the status hierarchy by proposing total mastery of the trivial, forcing the reader to admit that rigor is what dignifies a subject, not the subject itself.
The subtext is democratic and slightly cynical: knowledge is made, curated, and funded by taste and power. A collection that’s “complete” on some neglected corner can outlast fashionable breadth. In the 19th-century world of expanding print culture, new public libraries, and anxious middle-class self-improvement, Holmes offers a wry model for cultural stewardship: don’t chase omniscience. Build a legacy by becoming indispensable somewhere, even if that somewhere makes the respectable people laugh.
The intent is corrective. Holmes is pushing back on the fantasy of the “universal” library - the grand civic warehouse that pretends it can hold all knowledge with equal seriousness. Completeness, he implies, is a discipline, not a boast: pick a lane, go deep, be authoritative. The pinheads jab exposes a second target: prestige. Libraries (and the donors who love them) gravitate toward canonical subjects that signal refinement. Holmes flips the status hierarchy by proposing total mastery of the trivial, forcing the reader to admit that rigor is what dignifies a subject, not the subject itself.
The subtext is democratic and slightly cynical: knowledge is made, curated, and funded by taste and power. A collection that’s “complete” on some neglected corner can outlast fashionable breadth. In the 19th-century world of expanding print culture, new public libraries, and anxious middle-class self-improvement, Holmes offers a wry model for cultural stewardship: don’t chase omniscience. Build a legacy by becoming indispensable somewhere, even if that somewhere makes the respectable people laugh.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Oliver
Add to List





