"Every nation in every region now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists"
About this Quote
A line like this doesn’t merely draw a boundary; it redraws the map. Delivered in the charged aftermath of 9/11, Bush’s ultimatum compresses grief, fear, and a hunger for certainty into a single binary choice. Its genius, and its danger, is rhetorical efficiency: it evacuates the messy middle where diplomacy, neutrality, and critique usually live. The sentence is built to travel well on television and in briefing books, and it turns coalition-building into moral sorting.
The intent is straightforward: consolidate international support for the coming “War on Terror,” discourage fence-sitting, and signal that America will treat noncooperation as complicity. But the subtext does more work. By pairing “with us” against “with the terrorists,” Bush fuses U.S. policy with the concept of civilization itself. Alignment becomes a referendum not on strategy but on character. Allies aren’t just partners; they’re proof of legitimacy. Dissenters aren’t just skeptics; they’re suspect.
That framing also preemptively delegitimizes criticism at home. If the world is divided into helpers and enemies, then questioning methods, evidence, or end goals can be cast as weakening resolve. It’s a move that substitutes moral clarity for analytical clarity, which is exactly why it lands in moments of national trauma.
In context, it reflects a superpower’s post-attack impulse to simplify an unfamiliar threat into a familiar script: good vs. evil, loyalty vs. betrayal. The cost is baked into the cadence. Once politics is reduced to a binary, escalation becomes easier than revision, and nuance starts to look like disloyalty.
The intent is straightforward: consolidate international support for the coming “War on Terror,” discourage fence-sitting, and signal that America will treat noncooperation as complicity. But the subtext does more work. By pairing “with us” against “with the terrorists,” Bush fuses U.S. policy with the concept of civilization itself. Alignment becomes a referendum not on strategy but on character. Allies aren’t just partners; they’re proof of legitimacy. Dissenters aren’t just skeptics; they’re suspect.
That framing also preemptively delegitimizes criticism at home. If the world is divided into helpers and enemies, then questioning methods, evidence, or end goals can be cast as weakening resolve. It’s a move that substitutes moral clarity for analytical clarity, which is exactly why it lands in moments of national trauma.
In context, it reflects a superpower’s post-attack impulse to simplify an unfamiliar threat into a familiar script: good vs. evil, loyalty vs. betrayal. The cost is baked into the cadence. Once politics is reduced to a binary, escalation becomes easier than revision, and nuance starts to look like disloyalty.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | George W. Bush, Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People, Sept 20, 2001; contains the line "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." |
More Quotes by George
Add to List


