"Every one of my positions cuts - out half the country. I'm pro-choice, I'm pro-gay rights, I'm pro-immigration, I'm against guns, I believe in Darwin"
About this Quote
Bloomberg’s line is political self-portraiture as blunt-force arithmetic: each stance “cuts out half the country,” so the candidate is, by design, a walking act of subtraction. It’s a canny inversion of the usual unity talk. Rather than pretending his views are magically mainstream, he frames polarization as a predictable cost of having a worldview at all.
The list itself is doing strategic work. “Pro-choice,” “pro-gay rights,” “pro-immigration,” “against guns,” “I believe in Darwin” is a greatest-hits reel of late-20th/early-21st century American culture-war sorting mechanisms. He’s not only naming policies; he’s naming identity signals that tell donors, urban professionals, and socially liberal moderates exactly where he sits. Ending on Darwin is especially pointed: it’s less a policy position than a declaration of epistemology, a jab at religiously inflected politics that doubles as a wink to technocratic rationalism. Bloomberg’s brand has always leaned managerial - the competent adult with spreadsheets - and “I believe in Darwin” folds science into that persona.
The subtext is also defensive. Bloomberg is acknowledging that he’s not built to win by charm or ideological elasticity; he’s built to govern like a CEO. Saying the quiet part out loud (“I lose people”) reads as honesty, but it also pre-empts criticism: if you’re alienated, that’s not a flaw, it’s the math. In the era of purity tests and partisan media, he’s betting that clarity can substitute for warmth - and that enough of the remaining half has the money, turnout, and impatience to make it count.
The list itself is doing strategic work. “Pro-choice,” “pro-gay rights,” “pro-immigration,” “against guns,” “I believe in Darwin” is a greatest-hits reel of late-20th/early-21st century American culture-war sorting mechanisms. He’s not only naming policies; he’s naming identity signals that tell donors, urban professionals, and socially liberal moderates exactly where he sits. Ending on Darwin is especially pointed: it’s less a policy position than a declaration of epistemology, a jab at religiously inflected politics that doubles as a wink to technocratic rationalism. Bloomberg’s brand has always leaned managerial - the competent adult with spreadsheets - and “I believe in Darwin” folds science into that persona.
The subtext is also defensive. Bloomberg is acknowledging that he’s not built to win by charm or ideological elasticity; he’s built to govern like a CEO. Saying the quiet part out loud (“I lose people”) reads as honesty, but it also pre-empts criticism: if you’re alienated, that’s not a flaw, it’s the math. In the era of purity tests and partisan media, he’s betting that clarity can substitute for warmth - and that enough of the remaining half has the money, turnout, and impatience to make it count.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List


