"Every physical system registers information, and just by evolving in time, by doing its thing, it changes that information, transforms that information, or, if you like, processes that information"
About this Quote
Physics stops being a mute catalog of forces and starts looking suspiciously like computation. Seth Lloyd, a quantum information pioneer who’s spent decades arguing that the universe can be understood as a kind of computer, is doing a quiet bit of rhetorical jujitsu here: he takes the everyday, slightly sterile word "information" and makes it inescapably physical. Not metaphorically physical, not "data about the world", but literally inscribed in the state of matter and energy. If every physical system registers information, then a rock, a toaster, a hurricane, and your brain all sit on the same continuum: they are states that can be read, and their lawful evolution is a sequence of transformations. The subtext is radical humility about humans’ specialness. Our laptops aren’t magical; they’re just unusually well-controlled corners of nature doing what nature always does.
The intent is also strategic: it’s a bridge between two cultures that often talk past each other. To physicists, "evolving in time" is the fundamental story; to computer scientists, "processing information" is. Lloyd collapses the distinction without demanding you buy sci-fi claims about consciousness or simulation. Notice the conversational softeners - "by doing its thing", "or, if you like" - which invite readers into a reframing rather than confronting them with dogma. In context, this fits a post-1990s shift where computation isn’t merely a tool for studying physics; it becomes a lens for defining physical limits (what can be computed, how fast, at what energy cost). The line lands because it’s both modest and destabilizing: it sounds obvious, then rewires what "obvious" means.
The intent is also strategic: it’s a bridge between two cultures that often talk past each other. To physicists, "evolving in time" is the fundamental story; to computer scientists, "processing information" is. Lloyd collapses the distinction without demanding you buy sci-fi claims about consciousness or simulation. Notice the conversational softeners - "by doing its thing", "or, if you like" - which invite readers into a reframing rather than confronting them with dogma. In context, this fits a post-1990s shift where computation isn’t merely a tool for studying physics; it becomes a lens for defining physical limits (what can be computed, how fast, at what energy cost). The line lands because it’s both modest and destabilizing: it sounds obvious, then rewires what "obvious" means.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes On the Cosmos, Seth Lloyd, 2006. |
More Quotes by Seth
Add to List


