"Every piece of software written today is likely going to infringe on someone else's patent"
About this Quote
A chill runs through de Icaza's line because it treats patent infringement not as a rare moral lapse, but as an ambient condition of modern coding. The phrasing "every piece" is deliberately maximalist: he's not warning about a few bad actors or sloppy teams, he's indicting the system itself. And "likely" does a lot of work, telegraphing that this isn't conspiracy thinking; it's the probabilistic reality of building anything in a world where ideas have been diced into legal property.
The specific intent is pragmatic, almost managerial: if infringement is the default risk, then patents become less a shield for inventors than a cudgel for incumbents, trolls, and anyone with a litigation budget. His subtext is that software's combinatorial nature makes patent boundaries absurdly porous. Real programs are mosaics: protocols, algorithms, UI conventions, tiny optimizations. When those building blocks are patented at scale, "innovation" becomes a minefield navigated by lawyers rather than engineers.
Context matters: de Icaza is a prominent open-source figure, and open source is uniquely vulnerable to patent aggression because it distributes code widely and invites reuse. The quote doubles as a defense of openness and a critique of policy that treats software like a discrete, patentable machine part. It works rhetorically because it's both a threat assessment and a cultural diagnosis: we've built a knowledge economy where creating is easy, but permission is expensive, and the legal uncertainty is the point.
The specific intent is pragmatic, almost managerial: if infringement is the default risk, then patents become less a shield for inventors than a cudgel for incumbents, trolls, and anyone with a litigation budget. His subtext is that software's combinatorial nature makes patent boundaries absurdly porous. Real programs are mosaics: protocols, algorithms, UI conventions, tiny optimizations. When those building blocks are patented at scale, "innovation" becomes a minefield navigated by lawyers rather than engineers.
Context matters: de Icaza is a prominent open-source figure, and open source is uniquely vulnerable to patent aggression because it distributes code widely and invites reuse. The quote doubles as a defense of openness and a critique of policy that treats software like a discrete, patentable machine part. It works rhetorically because it's both a threat assessment and a cultural diagnosis: we've built a knowledge economy where creating is easy, but permission is expensive, and the legal uncertainty is the point.
Quote Details
| Topic | Coding & Programming |
|---|
More Quotes by Miguel
Add to List
