"Every state has not only the right but the duty to make adequate provision for its own defense in the way it thinks best, providing it does not do so at the expense of any other state"
About this Quote
Pearson’s line is a diplomat’s balancing act disguised as a moral principle: sovereignty, yes, but only the kind that can live in a neighborhood. “Not only the right but the duty” upgrades national defense from a discretionary budget item into an ethical obligation. In the Cold War context Pearson knew intimately - NATO’s formation, nuclear anxiety, decolonization, the Suez crisis - that framing matters. Calling defense a duty reassures anxious publics and skeptical allies that Canada (and by extension other mid-sized states) won’t free-ride under an American umbrella.
The second clause is where the real work happens. “In the way it thinks best” nods to autonomy and political reality: democracies have different threat perceptions, different appetites for conscription, different industrial capacities. Pearson isn’t demanding uniform militarization; he’s defending pluralism within an alliance system.
Then comes the leash: “providing it does not do so at the expense of any other state.” That’s the anti-arms-race sentence, the quiet rebuke to security policies that become other people’s emergencies - preemptive doctrines, destabilizing buildups, border provocations, covert meddling. The subtext is collective security without coercion: your safety can’t be purchased by making your neighbor less safe.
It’s also Pearson’s preferred Canadian posture in miniature: serious about defense, allergic to swagger, and invested in rules that let smaller countries matter. The intent isn’t pacifism; it’s containment of escalation through legitimacy. Defense is permitted, even required - but only within a moral economy where power doesn’t get to declare itself innocent.
The second clause is where the real work happens. “In the way it thinks best” nods to autonomy and political reality: democracies have different threat perceptions, different appetites for conscription, different industrial capacities. Pearson isn’t demanding uniform militarization; he’s defending pluralism within an alliance system.
Then comes the leash: “providing it does not do so at the expense of any other state.” That’s the anti-arms-race sentence, the quiet rebuke to security policies that become other people’s emergencies - preemptive doctrines, destabilizing buildups, border provocations, covert meddling. The subtext is collective security without coercion: your safety can’t be purchased by making your neighbor less safe.
It’s also Pearson’s preferred Canadian posture in miniature: serious about defense, allergic to swagger, and invested in rules that let smaller countries matter. The intent isn’t pacifism; it’s containment of escalation through legitimacy. Defense is permitted, even required - but only within a moral economy where power doesn’t get to declare itself innocent.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Lester
Add to List







