"Every superior personality, and every superior performance, has, for the average of mankind, something mysterious"
About this Quote
Superiority, Simmel suggests, doesn’t simply impress; it estranges. The “mysterious” isn’t a mystical aura emitted by great people so much as a social effect produced at the point of reception. For “the average of mankind,” excellence arrives as an interpretive problem: when a performance outruns the common yardsticks of evaluation, observers fill the gap with myth, suspicion, or reverence. Mystery is what happens when competence exceeds the audience’s vocabulary.
The phrasing does quiet double work. “Superior personality” makes charisma sound like a structure, not a soul. “Superior performance” shifts the focus from innate genius to visible outputs, hinting that the same person can be legible in one arena and uncanny in another. Simmel’s key move is to locate the mystery not in the superior individual but in the relation between them and the crowd. In modern life, where social comparison is constant and status hierarchies proliferate, the average person needs narratives that stabilize their own position: if the superior is “mysterious,” then their advantage is partially quarantined from critique and imitation.
Context matters here: Simmel wrote at the height of urban modernity, when anonymity and differentiation were becoming the default conditions of social experience. His broader work keeps returning to distance, secrecy, and the social uses of the unknown. “Mysterious” functions like a buffer. It protects the extraordinary from being reduced to merely technical skill, while also protecting the ordinary from the uncomfortable possibility that superiority might be learnable, contingent, or unfairly distributed. In that tension, admiration and resentment share the same fuel: opacity.
The phrasing does quiet double work. “Superior personality” makes charisma sound like a structure, not a soul. “Superior performance” shifts the focus from innate genius to visible outputs, hinting that the same person can be legible in one arena and uncanny in another. Simmel’s key move is to locate the mystery not in the superior individual but in the relation between them and the crowd. In modern life, where social comparison is constant and status hierarchies proliferate, the average person needs narratives that stabilize their own position: if the superior is “mysterious,” then their advantage is partially quarantined from critique and imitation.
Context matters here: Simmel wrote at the height of urban modernity, when anonymity and differentiation were becoming the default conditions of social experience. His broader work keeps returning to distance, secrecy, and the social uses of the unknown. “Mysterious” functions like a buffer. It protects the extraordinary from being reduced to merely technical skill, while also protecting the ordinary from the uncomfortable possibility that superiority might be learnable, contingent, or unfairly distributed. In that tension, admiration and resentment share the same fuel: opacity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Georg
Add to List










