"Every time economic and technical development takes a step forward, forces emerge which attempt to create political forms for what, on the economic-technical plane, has already more or less become reality"
About this Quote
Progress doesn’t politely wait for parliaments to catch up. Lange’s line is a cool, almost bureaucratic warning: when industry and technology change the facts on the ground, politics is forced into a reactive scramble to legalize, regulate, or domesticate what’s already happened. The “forces” he names aren’t necessarily noble reformers; they’re pressure groups, parties, bureaucracies, and business interests rushing to turn a new material reality into a stable set of rules - ideally rules that favor them.
The intent is pragmatic, even mildly chastening. Lange suggests that political “forms” (institutions, treaties, regulatory regimes, administrative states) are often downstream of infrastructure: railways and telegraphs first shrink distance, then governments invent new postal standards, tariffs, border controls, and international agreements to manage the consequences. It’s a view of politics as a kind of lagging interface between power and practice, less a realm of pure ideas than of belated design.
The subtext carries a democratic anxiety. If political structures arrive after the fact, who gets to write them? The early movers - corporations, militaries, technocrats - can harden their advantages before voters even understand what’s changing. That’s why the sentence feels contemporary: platforms and AI rewrite labor and information flows; only later do legislatures argue over privacy, competition, and accountability, often using yesterday’s categories.
Context matters: Lange, a Norwegian politician and Nobel Peace Prize laureate, worked in the age of mass industrialization and early internationalism, when cross-border commerce, communications, and war-making capacity outpaced the fragile architecture of global governance. His point isn’t utopian. It’s structural: material progress generates political invention, but also political capture.
The intent is pragmatic, even mildly chastening. Lange suggests that political “forms” (institutions, treaties, regulatory regimes, administrative states) are often downstream of infrastructure: railways and telegraphs first shrink distance, then governments invent new postal standards, tariffs, border controls, and international agreements to manage the consequences. It’s a view of politics as a kind of lagging interface between power and practice, less a realm of pure ideas than of belated design.
The subtext carries a democratic anxiety. If political structures arrive after the fact, who gets to write them? The early movers - corporations, militaries, technocrats - can harden their advantages before voters even understand what’s changing. That’s why the sentence feels contemporary: platforms and AI rewrite labor and information flows; only later do legislatures argue over privacy, competition, and accountability, often using yesterday’s categories.
Context matters: Lange, a Norwegian politician and Nobel Peace Prize laureate, worked in the age of mass industrialization and early internationalism, when cross-border commerce, communications, and war-making capacity outpaced the fragile architecture of global governance. His point isn’t utopian. It’s structural: material progress generates political invention, but also political capture.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Christian
Add to List

