"Every time you cut programs, you take away a person who has a vested interest in high taxes and you put him on the tax rolls and make him a taxpayer. A farmer on subsidies is part welfare bum, whereas a free-market farmer is a small businessman with a gun"
About this Quote
Norquist’s line is less an argument than a conversion ritual: take someone the state has labeled a recipient, strip away the benefit, and watch them re-emerge as a morally superior “taxpayer.” The trick is in the casting. “Vested interest in high taxes” reframes public programs as a selfish lobby, not a social contract. It’s a neat inversion: dependence becomes corruption, while taxation becomes victimhood. Cut the program and you don’t just save money; you purify incentives, swapping a suspect political identity for a trustworthy one.
The phrase “part welfare bum” is doing deliberate class theater. Farmers are a sympathetic group in American mythology, so Norquist punctures that sentimentality to make an example: even the heartland hero can be downgraded to a freeloader once government checks enter the story. It’s a provocation meant to harden listeners against the emotional blackmail that often protects subsidies.
Then comes the cultural payload: “a small businessman with a gun.” The gun isn’t policy detail; it’s shorthand for rugged autonomy, property, and the threat of coercion reversed. If the welfare state implies citizens are managed, the armed small businessman implies citizens who won’t be. This is 1990s-2000s anti-government conservatism in miniature: dismantle programs to dismantle constituencies, because budgets aren’t just spreadsheets, they’re voter factories. The subtext is blunt: shrink government to shrink the people who like it, and you shrink the politics that sustains it.
The phrase “part welfare bum” is doing deliberate class theater. Farmers are a sympathetic group in American mythology, so Norquist punctures that sentimentality to make an example: even the heartland hero can be downgraded to a freeloader once government checks enter the story. It’s a provocation meant to harden listeners against the emotional blackmail that often protects subsidies.
Then comes the cultural payload: “a small businessman with a gun.” The gun isn’t policy detail; it’s shorthand for rugged autonomy, property, and the threat of coercion reversed. If the welfare state implies citizens are managed, the armed small businessman implies citizens who won’t be. This is 1990s-2000s anti-government conservatism in miniature: dismantle programs to dismantle constituencies, because budgets aren’t just spreadsheets, they’re voter factories. The subtext is blunt: shrink government to shrink the people who like it, and you shrink the politics that sustains it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Grover
Add to List


