"Everybody experiences far more than he understands. Yet it is experience, rather than understanding, that influences behavior"
About this Quote
McLuhan’s line lands like a calm insult to the cult of self-awareness. We like to imagine ourselves as rational narrators of our own lives, converting events into tidy lessons. He flips that: most of what hits us never becomes knowledge, and it doesn’t need to. Experience works on us anyway, beneath the level of explanation, steering habits, fears, tastes, and reflexes long before the intellect files a report.
The intent is classic McLuhan: pry attention away from content and toward effect. In the media ecology he helped name, the environment is the message. You don’t have to “understand” television, advertising, or a smartphone notification loop for it to rewire attention and expectation. The subtext is a warning about how easily we confuse having an interpretation with having agency. Understanding becomes a vanity metric; experience is the operating system.
Context matters: mid-century mass media, postwar consumer culture, and the rise of behavioral sciences were all undermining Enlightenment confidence in the sovereign, reasoning individual. McLuhan isn’t simply anti-intellectual. He’s pointing out a mismatch between where influence happens (pattern, repetition, sensory immersion) and where we prefer to locate responsibility (articulated beliefs). That gap is where propaganda thrives, where design nudges, where “common sense” quietly updates itself.
It’s also a backhanded critique of education and politics: teaching people arguments isn’t the same as changing the conditions that train their behavior. If you want different citizens, he implies, alter the experiences that manufacture them.
The intent is classic McLuhan: pry attention away from content and toward effect. In the media ecology he helped name, the environment is the message. You don’t have to “understand” television, advertising, or a smartphone notification loop for it to rewire attention and expectation. The subtext is a warning about how easily we confuse having an interpretation with having agency. Understanding becomes a vanity metric; experience is the operating system.
Context matters: mid-century mass media, postwar consumer culture, and the rise of behavioral sciences were all undermining Enlightenment confidence in the sovereign, reasoning individual. McLuhan isn’t simply anti-intellectual. He’s pointing out a mismatch between where influence happens (pattern, repetition, sensory immersion) and where we prefer to locate responsibility (articulated beliefs). That gap is where propaganda thrives, where design nudges, where “common sense” quietly updates itself.
It’s also a backhanded critique of education and politics: teaching people arguments isn’t the same as changing the conditions that train their behavior. If you want different citizens, he implies, alter the experiences that manufacture them.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Marshall
Add to List





