"Everybody should want to make sure that we have the cyber tools necessary to investigate cyber crimes, and to be prepared to defend against them and to bring people to justice who commit it"
About this Quote
Janet Reno is doing a careful bit of rhetorical carpentry here: building a public consensus for stronger state power without ever saying the loud part out loud. The phrase "Everybody should want" isn’t just inclusive; it’s a soft coercion, the kind of civic commonsense framing that makes dissent sound like irresponsibility. You’re invited into a moral majority before the policy details even arrive.
Her word choice stitches together three goals that don’t always sit comfortably together: "investigate", "defend", and "bring people to justice". Investigation implies access. Defense implies readiness and capacity. Justice implies legitimacy. Put side by side, they create a chain of inevitability: if you care about security, you must accept the tools; if you accept the tools, you should accept their use; if you accept their use, you should accept their expansion. It’s a classic law-and-order logic updated for a domain that feels abstract to most people and therefore easier to narrate as exceptional.
The slightly clumsy "commit it" is revealing too: "cyber crimes" are plural, diffuse, and evolving, yet the sentence wants a single villain to hold. That simplification matters politically. In the 1990s, as the internet shifted from novelty to infrastructure, law enforcement faced a legitimacy problem: the public wanted the benefits of connectivity without the fear that came with it. Reno’s intent is to translate a technical arms race into a simple bargain: give us capability, and we’ll give you safety and accountability. The subtext is that capability means surveillance, stronger federal reach, and new precedents set in a space where the rules were still being written.
Her word choice stitches together three goals that don’t always sit comfortably together: "investigate", "defend", and "bring people to justice". Investigation implies access. Defense implies readiness and capacity. Justice implies legitimacy. Put side by side, they create a chain of inevitability: if you care about security, you must accept the tools; if you accept the tools, you should accept their use; if you accept their use, you should accept their expansion. It’s a classic law-and-order logic updated for a domain that feels abstract to most people and therefore easier to narrate as exceptional.
The slightly clumsy "commit it" is revealing too: "cyber crimes" are plural, diffuse, and evolving, yet the sentence wants a single villain to hold. That simplification matters politically. In the 1990s, as the internet shifted from novelty to infrastructure, law enforcement faced a legitimacy problem: the public wanted the benefits of connectivity without the fear that came with it. Reno’s intent is to translate a technical arms race into a simple bargain: give us capability, and we’ll give you safety and accountability. The subtext is that capability means surveillance, stronger federal reach, and new precedents set in a space where the rules were still being written.
Quote Details
| Topic | Privacy & Cybersecurity |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Janet
Add to List




