"Evolution is a bankrupt speculative philosophy, not a scientific fact. Only a spiritually bankrupt society could ever believe it. Only atheists could accept this Satanic theory"
About this Quote
Swaggart’s line isn’t trying to win an argument about fossils or genetics; it’s trying to win a boundary war. By calling evolution “bankrupt” and “speculative,” he borrows the language of finance and flimsy investing to frame science as a doomed bet, then pivots to a moral audit: “spiritually bankrupt society.” The move is classic culture-war alchemy: convert a technical question into a test of character, then into a test of belonging.
The real target is less Darwin than drift. In late-20th-century American evangelical life, evolution often functioned as a shorthand for a whole package of anxieties: secular schooling, permissive culture, the authority of experts, and the fear that scripture is being demoted from truth to “belief.” Swaggart compresses that unease into a binary: you either reject evolution or you’re aligned with “atheists.” That word doesn’t just denote disbelief; it signals an out-group with presumed motives and morals.
Calling evolution “Satanic” is not an evidence claim; it’s a spiritual framing device. It makes the issue un-debatable, because to entertain the theory becomes spiritually dangerous. That’s the intent: preempt nuance, foreclose compromise, and rally the faithful by treating scientific acceptance as capitulation in a cosmic struggle. The subtext is authority preservation. If evolution stands as fact, a certain kind of pulpit certainty wobbles. So the quote restores hierarchy by redefining disagreement as sin, and science as seduction.
The real target is less Darwin than drift. In late-20th-century American evangelical life, evolution often functioned as a shorthand for a whole package of anxieties: secular schooling, permissive culture, the authority of experts, and the fear that scripture is being demoted from truth to “belief.” Swaggart compresses that unease into a binary: you either reject evolution or you’re aligned with “atheists.” That word doesn’t just denote disbelief; it signals an out-group with presumed motives and morals.
Calling evolution “Satanic” is not an evidence claim; it’s a spiritual framing device. It makes the issue un-debatable, because to entertain the theory becomes spiritually dangerous. That’s the intent: preempt nuance, foreclose compromise, and rally the faithful by treating scientific acceptance as capitulation in a cosmic struggle. The subtext is authority preservation. If evolution stands as fact, a certain kind of pulpit certainty wobbles. So the quote restores hierarchy by redefining disagreement as sin, and science as seduction.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|
More Quotes by Jimmy
Add to List
