"Excellent firms don't believe in excellence - only in constant improvement and constant change"
About this Quote
Excellence is the kind of word that sedates organizations. Tom Peters punctures it with a line that sounds like a paradox but works like a warning label: the moment a firm starts “believing in excellence,” it starts curating a reputation instead of doing the messy work that earned it.
The intent is managerial provocation. Peters isn’t arguing against high standards; he’s arguing against the museumification of success. “Excellence” becomes a trophy you polish, a brand promise you protect, a story you tell investors and recruits. That story invites complacency, because it frames quality as an identity rather than a practice. By contrast, “constant improvement and constant change” are verbs. They force a company to stay in motion, to treat every win as provisional, to assume the market is already moving under its feet.
The subtext is also cultural: a jab at corporate self-congratulation and the late-20th-century obsession with best practices. Peters emerged as a major voice in the 1980s, when American business was panicking about Japanese manufacturing, quality circles, and the uncomfortable idea that operational discipline beats swagger. In that context, “don’t believe in excellence” reads like anti-mission-statement realism: excellence isn’t a destination you declare, it’s a temporary side effect of systems that keep learning.
There’s a productive cruelty here. If change is constant, comfort is the enemy. Peters is telling leaders to stop defending yesterday’s “excellent” and start redesigning how the firm notices, adapts, and improves before it’s forced to.
The intent is managerial provocation. Peters isn’t arguing against high standards; he’s arguing against the museumification of success. “Excellence” becomes a trophy you polish, a brand promise you protect, a story you tell investors and recruits. That story invites complacency, because it frames quality as an identity rather than a practice. By contrast, “constant improvement and constant change” are verbs. They force a company to stay in motion, to treat every win as provisional, to assume the market is already moving under its feet.
The subtext is also cultural: a jab at corporate self-congratulation and the late-20th-century obsession with best practices. Peters emerged as a major voice in the 1980s, when American business was panicking about Japanese manufacturing, quality circles, and the uncomfortable idea that operational discipline beats swagger. In that context, “don’t believe in excellence” reads like anti-mission-statement realism: excellence isn’t a destination you declare, it’s a temporary side effect of systems that keep learning.
There’s a productive cruelty here. If change is constant, comfort is the enemy. Peters is telling leaders to stop defending yesterday’s “excellent” and start redesigning how the firm notices, adapts, and improves before it’s forced to.
Quote Details
| Topic | Embrace Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List










