"Experience burned into me the conviction that access to education ought to be based on how much you are willing to learn and how hard you are willing to work, not on how many dollars your family has in their bank account"
About this Quote
Obey’s line carries the moral certainty of someone who’s watched merit get mugged by money and decided to name the thief out loud. The phrase “burned into me” isn’t decorative; it signals politics as lived consequence, not abstract principle. He’s not proposing a tweak to the system so much as indicting the premise that education is a consumer good rationed by family wealth. That opening claim of experience also functions as a credibility shield: he’s daring you to argue with what he has seen.
The sentence sets up a blunt, American meritocratic bargain - willingness to learn, willingness to work - and then exposes how often that bargain is broken by the oldest gatekeeper in the country: cash. It’s shrewd rhetoric. By anchoring access to education in values most voters already endorse (effort, ambition), Obey makes redistribution sound less like charity and more like fairness. The subtext is a rebuke to the comforting myth that student outcomes are purely a matter of grit. If the starting line is priced, “hard work” becomes a slogan that flatters the winners.
Context matters here: Obey is a long-serving Democratic congressman from Wisconsin, a state with deep public-university traditions and a recurring fight over whether higher education is a public infrastructure or a private investment. His wording suggests a policy agenda without naming it - need-based aid, affordable tuition, expanded public funding - while framing opposition as elitism. It’s also a strategic political bridge: he invites working- and middle-class families into the coalition by treating education as earned opportunity, not inherited privilege.
The sentence sets up a blunt, American meritocratic bargain - willingness to learn, willingness to work - and then exposes how often that bargain is broken by the oldest gatekeeper in the country: cash. It’s shrewd rhetoric. By anchoring access to education in values most voters already endorse (effort, ambition), Obey makes redistribution sound less like charity and more like fairness. The subtext is a rebuke to the comforting myth that student outcomes are purely a matter of grit. If the starting line is priced, “hard work” becomes a slogan that flatters the winners.
Context matters here: Obey is a long-serving Democratic congressman from Wisconsin, a state with deep public-university traditions and a recurring fight over whether higher education is a public infrastructure or a private investment. His wording suggests a policy agenda without naming it - need-based aid, affordable tuition, expanded public funding - while framing opposition as elitism. It’s also a strategic political bridge: he invites working- and middle-class families into the coalition by treating education as earned opportunity, not inherited privilege.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Dave
Add to List
