"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence"
About this Quote
Adams is doing more than praising truth; he is weaponizing it. “Facts are stubborn things” lands with the blunt certainty of a gavel, a line designed to end an argument by shifting the ground from sentiment to proof. The sentence then widens into a small anatomy of human self-deception: wishes, inclinations, passions. Adams stacks them like charges, suggesting that the real opponent in civic life isn’t ignorance but motivated reasoning - the urge to bend reality until it flatters our side.
The craft is in the contrast. “Stubborn” is almost folksy, a word you’d use for a mule or a child, which makes the claim feel commonsensical rather than lofty. Then comes the formal march of “facts and evidence,” the language of courtrooms and record-keeping. Adams isn’t speaking as a philosopher; he’s speaking as a lawyer-politician insisting that public decisions must survive cross-examination.
Context matters: the line comes from Adams’s 1770 defense after the Boston Massacre, when anti-British outrage made due process unpopular. He was arguing that even morally convenient narratives can be wrong, and that a republic that lets passion pre-write verdicts becomes a mob with paperwork. The subtext is a warning aimed at his own camp as much as his opponents: if you want a nation of laws, you have to accept that facts will sometimes embarrass you. That’s the cost of legitimacy - and Adams is daring his audience to pay it.
The craft is in the contrast. “Stubborn” is almost folksy, a word you’d use for a mule or a child, which makes the claim feel commonsensical rather than lofty. Then comes the formal march of “facts and evidence,” the language of courtrooms and record-keeping. Adams isn’t speaking as a philosopher; he’s speaking as a lawyer-politician insisting that public decisions must survive cross-examination.
Context matters: the line comes from Adams’s 1770 defense after the Boston Massacre, when anti-British outrage made due process unpopular. He was arguing that even morally convenient narratives can be wrong, and that a republic that lets passion pre-write verdicts becomes a mob with paperwork. The subtext is a warning aimed at his own camp as much as his opponents: if you want a nation of laws, you have to accept that facts will sometimes embarrass you. That’s the cost of legitimacy - and Adams is daring his audience to pay it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List










