"Far too often the choices reality proposes are such as to take away one's taste for choosing"
About this Quote
Reality, Rostand suggests, doesn’t just constrain us; it corrodes the very appetite for agency. The line lands because it diagnoses a psychological defeat that comes before any actual decision: when the available options are all bad, “choice” becomes a kind of insult. It’s not fatalism dressed up as wisdom so much as a warning about how environments can train people out of autonomy, replacing deliberation with numb compliance.
The phrasing does quiet violence. “Reality proposes” makes the world sound polite, even reasonable, like a host offering a menu. Then the knife twist: the menu is engineered to ruin your “taste for choosing.” That sensory word matters. Rostand isn’t talking about abstract freedom; he’s talking about the felt pleasure of deciding, the small human thrill of preference. Strip that away and you don’t need overt coercion anymore. People will self-administer resignation.
Coming from a scientist and public intellectual in mid-20th-century France, the remark reads as postwar clarity rather than café pessimism. Rostand lived through ideological systems that specialized in presenting “choices” that were really traps: collaborate or starve, conform or vanish, accept the official story or become the problem. It also fits a technocratic age where expertise and institutions can narrow the decision space while insisting it’s all just “the facts.”
The subtext is political and personal: if you want citizens (or colleagues, or patients) to stop questioning, you don’t always have to silence them. Just make every option feel like loss.
The phrasing does quiet violence. “Reality proposes” makes the world sound polite, even reasonable, like a host offering a menu. Then the knife twist: the menu is engineered to ruin your “taste for choosing.” That sensory word matters. Rostand isn’t talking about abstract freedom; he’s talking about the felt pleasure of deciding, the small human thrill of preference. Strip that away and you don’t need overt coercion anymore. People will self-administer resignation.
Coming from a scientist and public intellectual in mid-20th-century France, the remark reads as postwar clarity rather than café pessimism. Rostand lived through ideological systems that specialized in presenting “choices” that were really traps: collaborate or starve, conform or vanish, accept the official story or become the problem. It also fits a technocratic age where expertise and institutions can narrow the decision space while insisting it’s all just “the facts.”
The subtext is political and personal: if you want citizens (or colleagues, or patients) to stop questioning, you don’t always have to silence them. Just make every option feel like loss.
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|
More Quotes by Jean
Add to List
