"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power"
About this Quote
A dictator naming his own operating system is never just definition; its public relations. Mussolini’s line is calibrated to make fascism sound less like brute coercion and more like managerial “coordination” between government and industry. “Corporatism” is the linguistic sleight of hand: it borrows the respectable aura of commerce and organization while draining the word “fascism” of its street violence, censorship, and one-party rule. The intent is to rebrand domination as efficiency.
The subtext is transactional. By casting the regime as a “merger,” Mussolini signals to industrialists that they won’t be abolished, they’ll be deputized. Private capital can keep its profits and its hierarchies, so long as it serves the national project and accepts political obedience. That is the quiet bargain inside many authoritarian economies: the state guarantees labor discipline, crushes left opposition, and stabilizes markets; business supplies production, expertise, and legitimacy. Calling this arrangement “more appropriate” is also a claim of inevitability, as if fascism simply reflects modern complexity rather than a choice enforced by police power.
Context matters because “corporatism” in interwar Italy had a specific meaning: not today’s corporate lobbying, but a state-run system of “corporations” (industry syndicates) meant to replace class conflict with controlled collaboration. It marketed itself as a third way between laissez-faire capitalism and socialism, while in practice locking workers and employers into institutions ultimately answerable to the regime. The line works because it flatters elites, reassures moderates, and disguises repression as partnership. It’s a definition designed to recruit.
The subtext is transactional. By casting the regime as a “merger,” Mussolini signals to industrialists that they won’t be abolished, they’ll be deputized. Private capital can keep its profits and its hierarchies, so long as it serves the national project and accepts political obedience. That is the quiet bargain inside many authoritarian economies: the state guarantees labor discipline, crushes left opposition, and stabilizes markets; business supplies production, expertise, and legitimacy. Calling this arrangement “more appropriate” is also a claim of inevitability, as if fascism simply reflects modern complexity rather than a choice enforced by police power.
Context matters because “corporatism” in interwar Italy had a specific meaning: not today’s corporate lobbying, but a state-run system of “corporations” (industry syndicates) meant to replace class conflict with controlled collaboration. It marketed itself as a third way between laissez-faire capitalism and socialism, while in practice locking workers and employers into institutions ultimately answerable to the regime. The line works because it flatters elites, reassures moderates, and disguises repression as partnership. It’s a definition designed to recruit.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Later attribution: HITLER WAS SOCIALIST -Nazis, Communists, Fascists (Johnny Quest, Hector J. Peabody, Ian ...) modern compilationID: 3ZFOEAAAQBAJ
Evidence: ... Benito Mussolini did NOT say: "Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power." That fake quote was commonly attributed [25] to Mussolini until the attribution was debunked by ... Other candidates (1) Benito Mussolini (Benito Mussolini) compilation37.9% onalism that is a luxury article which only the elevated can practise because peoples are passionately bound to their... |
More Quotes by Benito
Add to List




