"Feminine virtue is nothing but a convenient masculine invention"
About this Quote
“Feminine virtue” is a trap dressed up as a compliment, and Ninon de Lenclos yanks off the ribbon. Her line works because it refuses the cozy premise that virtue is a neutral moral category. She frames it as a technology: a social tool engineered for someone else’s benefit. “Convenient” is the scalpel here. It implies not reverence but utility, a standard designed to sort women into safe and unsafe, marriageable and disposable, obedient and dangerous.
The subtext is economic and political. In a world where women’s bodies were treated as assets that secured inheritance, alliances, and reputation, chastity wasn’t merely a private ethic; it was a public credential. Calling it a “masculine invention” flips the burden of proof: if the rule was authored by men, then the moral panic around women’s sexuality starts to look like brand management, not ethics.
De Lenclos could say this with credibility because she lived as a kind of early modern celebrity-intellectual: a salonniere, courtesan, and cultural operator who navigated elite society without fully submitting to its script. Her notoriety becomes part of the argument. She’s not pleading for permission; she’s exposing the business model behind permission.
It also lands because it’s not a romantic defense of “freedom” in the abstract. It’s a cold read of power. The sentence implies that virtue, as sold to women, often functions as a leash: a way to make self-policing feel like dignity. In 2026 terms, it’s a proto-takedown of respectability politics, centuries before the phrase existed.
The subtext is economic and political. In a world where women’s bodies were treated as assets that secured inheritance, alliances, and reputation, chastity wasn’t merely a private ethic; it was a public credential. Calling it a “masculine invention” flips the burden of proof: if the rule was authored by men, then the moral panic around women’s sexuality starts to look like brand management, not ethics.
De Lenclos could say this with credibility because she lived as a kind of early modern celebrity-intellectual: a salonniere, courtesan, and cultural operator who navigated elite society without fully submitting to its script. Her notoriety becomes part of the argument. She’s not pleading for permission; she’s exposing the business model behind permission.
It also lands because it’s not a romantic defense of “freedom” in the abstract. It’s a cold read of power. The sentence implies that virtue, as sold to women, often functions as a leash: a way to make self-policing feel like dignity. In 2026 terms, it’s a proto-takedown of respectability politics, centuries before the phrase existed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ninon
Add to List





