"First and foremost - our vision for a united and peaceful Georgia is based on respect for the desire - and respect for the right - to South Ossetian autonomy"
About this Quote
Saakashvili is trying to square a circle on live television: sell national unity while conceding, at least rhetorically, that a breakaway region has claims that can’t be bulldozed away. The line is engineered to calm two audiences at once. To Georgians, “united and peaceful Georgia” signals the non-negotiable end state: territorial integrity. To South Ossetians and the international community, the repeated “respect” performs restraint and modern statehood, an attempt to trade the image of coercive reconquest for the language of rights.
That repetition is doing quiet heavy lifting. “Desire” acknowledges grievance and identity without admitting legitimacy of secession. “Right” elevates the offer from a tactical compromise to something that sounds principled, even constitutional. “Autonomy” is the key pressure valve: it suggests meaningful self-rule while keeping the border on the map where Tbilisi wants it. It’s a classic statesman’s formulation, designed to sound generous while tightly bounding the concession.
The context is the combustible post-Soviet patchwork where “autonomy” is never just administrative; it’s a security question with Russia hovering as patron and pretext. Saakashvili’s pro-Western project depended on appearing democratic and pluralist, especially to NATO and EU listeners, even as the state sought to reassert control over separatist territories. The subtext: we can be both a nation and a negotiator - but only on terms that stop short of independence.
That repetition is doing quiet heavy lifting. “Desire” acknowledges grievance and identity without admitting legitimacy of secession. “Right” elevates the offer from a tactical compromise to something that sounds principled, even constitutional. “Autonomy” is the key pressure valve: it suggests meaningful self-rule while keeping the border on the map where Tbilisi wants it. It’s a classic statesman’s formulation, designed to sound generous while tightly bounding the concession.
The context is the combustible post-Soviet patchwork where “autonomy” is never just administrative; it’s a security question with Russia hovering as patron and pretext. Saakashvili’s pro-Western project depended on appearing democratic and pluralist, especially to NATO and EU listeners, even as the state sought to reassert control over separatist territories. The subtext: we can be both a nation and a negotiator - but only on terms that stop short of independence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Mikhail
Add to List




