"First of all it has never been the case that I have threatened people with expulsion or that I've threatened to throw people out of the Parliamentary Labour Party"
About this Quote
The giveaway is in the throat-clearing: "First of all". It signals a politician bracing for impact, not offering clarity. Ron Davies isn’t just denying an allegation; he’s trying to control the frame before the facts settle. The sentence is built like a legal affidavit disguised as plain speech, with its double negatives and careful scope: "never been the case" narrows truth to a prosecutable standard, not a human one.
The repetition does the real work. "Threatened people with expulsion" and "threatened to throw people out" are near-synonyms, but saying both creates a fog of specificity. It lets him appear emphatic while quietly inviting a technical escape hatch: maybe there were warnings, pressures, "conversations", or procedural maneuvers, but not a "threat". Not that phrase, not that act. Political language loves this move: deny the verb, keep the outcome.
Naming the "Parliamentary Labour Party" is another tell. It’s institution-first rhetoric, a reminder that discipline is handled by structures, not personal vendettas. Subtext: if something harsh happened, it was process, not bullying. It’s also aimed inward, at MPs and activists attuned to factional warfare; the audience is people who know expulsion is less a punishment than a message.
Contextually, this kind of denial lives in parties perpetually managing internal dissent. The intent isn’t only to rebut; it’s to reassure colleagues he’s not the kind of operator who makes threats - while signaling he still has the authority everyone’s whispering about.
The repetition does the real work. "Threatened people with expulsion" and "threatened to throw people out" are near-synonyms, but saying both creates a fog of specificity. It lets him appear emphatic while quietly inviting a technical escape hatch: maybe there were warnings, pressures, "conversations", or procedural maneuvers, but not a "threat". Not that phrase, not that act. Political language loves this move: deny the verb, keep the outcome.
Naming the "Parliamentary Labour Party" is another tell. It’s institution-first rhetoric, a reminder that discipline is handled by structures, not personal vendettas. Subtext: if something harsh happened, it was process, not bullying. It’s also aimed inward, at MPs and activists attuned to factional warfare; the audience is people who know expulsion is less a punishment than a message.
Contextually, this kind of denial lives in parties perpetually managing internal dissent. The intent isn’t only to rebut; it’s to reassure colleagues he’s not the kind of operator who makes threats - while signaling he still has the authority everyone’s whispering about.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by Ron
Add to List