"First, we did rank everybody by risk, and New York comes out number one"
About this Quote
A technocrat’s candor can land like a threat, and Chertoff’s line has that chilled efficiency: “First” signals procedure over people, a checklist mentality that treats cities as variables in an equation. The phrase “rank everybody by risk” isn’t just bureaucratic shorthand; it’s a worldview. In the post-9/11 security state, “risk” became the master category that could justify almost anything - surveillance, funding decisions, policing priorities - because it sounds neutral, mathematical, above politics. But ranking is never neutral. It creates winners and losers, and it launders value judgments through the language of expertise.
New York “comes out number one” is especially telling. It borrows the cadence of a sports result or a consumer report, as if being the top target is an inconvenient badge. There’s a subtle rhetorical judo here: the city’s symbolic and economic centrality is acknowledged while responsibility is quietly displaced. If New York is “number one,” then extraordinary measures feel pre-approved by the data, not chosen by officials. It’s an attempt to convert fear into administrative inevitability.
The likely context is homeland security resource allocation - grant formulas, threat assessments, and the perennial fight between high-profile targets and smaller jurisdictions demanding a piece of the counterterrorism budget. Chertoff’s intent is to defend prioritization. The subtext is a warning wrapped as a spreadsheet: the state is watching because it believes someone else is watching you, too.
New York “comes out number one” is especially telling. It borrows the cadence of a sports result or a consumer report, as if being the top target is an inconvenient badge. There’s a subtle rhetorical judo here: the city’s symbolic and economic centrality is acknowledged while responsibility is quietly displaced. If New York is “number one,” then extraordinary measures feel pre-approved by the data, not chosen by officials. It’s an attempt to convert fear into administrative inevitability.
The likely context is homeland security resource allocation - grant formulas, threat assessments, and the perennial fight between high-profile targets and smaller jurisdictions demanding a piece of the counterterrorism budget. Chertoff’s intent is to defend prioritization. The subtext is a warning wrapped as a spreadsheet: the state is watching because it believes someone else is watching you, too.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List








