"First, we should not be opening our coasts, all of our coasts, to oil drilling when we have not taken the first step, not the first step, to conserve oil"
About this Quote
The line is built like a legislative trap: if you haven’t done the homework on demand, you don’t get to sprint ahead on supply. Boehlert isn’t arguing about oil drilling in the abstract; he’s indicting a political reflex that treats extraction as “action” and conservation as optional virtue-signaling. The repetition - “not the first step, not the first step” - isn’t verbal clutter. It’s a prosecutorial rhythm, the kind meant to survive a clip on the evening news and still land as an accusation: you’re proposing irreversible industrial expansion without even attempting the cheapest, fastest policy lever.
“Opening our coasts, all of our coasts” widens the blast radius. Coastal drilling isn’t just an energy question; it’s a wager with fisheries, tourism, and local ecosystems. By emphasizing “all,” he frames the proposal as overreach, not prudence - a maximalist move dressed up as necessity. The subtext: if leaders truly believed this was an emergency, they’d start with conservation because it’s politically harder but materially smarter. Instead, they’re chasing the optics of toughness and production, and catering to constituencies that benefit from drilling contracts and royalty streams.
The context sits in the recurring American pattern of energy panic politics: spikes in gas prices, geopolitical instability, and the ever-present temptation to promise immediate relief through domestic drilling. Boehlert’s intent is to flip the burden of proof. Before you industrialize the shoreline, show the public you’ve tried efficiency standards, fuel economy, transit investment, and reduced consumption. Otherwise “energy independence” is just a slogan with an oil sheen.
“Opening our coasts, all of our coasts” widens the blast radius. Coastal drilling isn’t just an energy question; it’s a wager with fisheries, tourism, and local ecosystems. By emphasizing “all,” he frames the proposal as overreach, not prudence - a maximalist move dressed up as necessity. The subtext: if leaders truly believed this was an emergency, they’d start with conservation because it’s politically harder but materially smarter. Instead, they’re chasing the optics of toughness and production, and catering to constituencies that benefit from drilling contracts and royalty streams.
The context sits in the recurring American pattern of energy panic politics: spikes in gas prices, geopolitical instability, and the ever-present temptation to promise immediate relief through domestic drilling. Boehlert’s intent is to flip the burden of proof. Before you industrialize the shoreline, show the public you’ve tried efficiency standards, fuel economy, transit investment, and reduced consumption. Otherwise “energy independence” is just a slogan with an oil sheen.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ocean & Sea |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Sherwood
Add to List
