"Five years ago, people were crying and feeling the Japanese were about to take over the Earth. I don't hear that kind of talk anymore"
About this Quote
Kilby’s line lands like a quiet lab-room jab: a scientist watching the public repeatedly fail a basic test of prediction. “Crying and feeling” isn’t accidental diction. He’s framing techno-economic panic as a kind of emotional contagion, not analysis. The hyperbole of “take over the Earth” mirrors the exaggeration he’s critiquing, letting the sentence parody the original fear even as it reports it.
The context is the late-’70s to ’80s wave of Japan anxiety in the U.S.: cars, consumer electronics, semiconductors, management “miracles,” trade deficits, and a media ecosystem that sold national competition as existential threat. As an engineer who helped invent the integrated circuit, Kilby had a front-row seat to how innovation diffuses, how supply chains sprawl, how today’s manufacturing dominance can be tomorrow’s commodity. His point isn’t that Japan wasn’t formidable; it’s that the story people told about Japan was never really about Japan. It was a mirror for American insecurity, filtered through headlines and political incentives.
The subtext is a warning about narrative volatility: mass opinion swings not because fundamentals radically change, but because attention does. Five years is an indictment of short memory and the way “takeover” rhetoric burns hot and then evaporates, leaving little accountability for those who stoked it. Kilby’s scientist sensibility is doing cultural criticism by implication: if we can be this wrong, this loudly, this recently, maybe the problem isn’t the competitor. It’s our appetite for simple, apocalyptic plots.
The context is the late-’70s to ’80s wave of Japan anxiety in the U.S.: cars, consumer electronics, semiconductors, management “miracles,” trade deficits, and a media ecosystem that sold national competition as existential threat. As an engineer who helped invent the integrated circuit, Kilby had a front-row seat to how innovation diffuses, how supply chains sprawl, how today’s manufacturing dominance can be tomorrow’s commodity. His point isn’t that Japan wasn’t formidable; it’s that the story people told about Japan was never really about Japan. It was a mirror for American insecurity, filtered through headlines and political incentives.
The subtext is a warning about narrative volatility: mass opinion swings not because fundamentals radically change, but because attention does. Five years is an indictment of short memory and the way “takeover” rhetoric burns hot and then evaporates, leaving little accountability for those who stoked it. Kilby’s scientist sensibility is doing cultural criticism by implication: if we can be this wrong, this loudly, this recently, maybe the problem isn’t the competitor. It’s our appetite for simple, apocalyptic plots.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Jack
Add to List
