"Flight by machines heavier than air is unpractical and insignificant, if not utterly impossible"
About this Quote
Newcomb’s dismissal of heavier-than-air flight lands with the particular authority of a man trained to trust equations over wishful thinking. It’s not just skepticism; it’s a boundary-drawing exercise. By branding the idea “unpractical and insignificant,” he’s policing the line between respectable science and the era’s crankish enthusiasms, when balloons, gliders, and would-be inventors crowded the public imagination. The sting is in the double move: even if it could be done, he suggests, it wouldn’t matter.
The intent is defensive in the way institutions get when novelty threatens to make them look gullible. Newcomb is speaking from a late-19th-century worldview where power-to-weight ratios, materials, and propulsion seemed to lock humans to the ground. In that context, “impossible” isn’t mere arrogance; it’s a probabilistic judgment dressed up as certainty, the rhetorician’s shortcut for “not within the known constraints.” That’s why it works as a quote: it reveals how scientific confidence can harden into cultural posture. The mathematician’s voice carries the prestige of rigor, but the sentence is doing social work, too, warning peers and the public not to waste attention on a dream.
The subtext reads differently after Kitty Hawk: it’s an accidental parable about how breakthroughs often arrive not by refuting math, but by changing the parameters the math assumed were fixed. It’s a reminder that expertise can be precise and still be provincially timed.
The intent is defensive in the way institutions get when novelty threatens to make them look gullible. Newcomb is speaking from a late-19th-century worldview where power-to-weight ratios, materials, and propulsion seemed to lock humans to the ground. In that context, “impossible” isn’t mere arrogance; it’s a probabilistic judgment dressed up as certainty, the rhetorician’s shortcut for “not within the known constraints.” That’s why it works as a quote: it reveals how scientific confidence can harden into cultural posture. The mathematician’s voice carries the prestige of rigor, but the sentence is doing social work, too, warning peers and the public not to waste attention on a dream.
The subtext reads differently after Kitty Hawk: it’s an accidental parable about how breakthroughs often arrive not by refuting math, but by changing the parameters the math assumed were fixed. It’s a reminder that expertise can be precise and still be provincially timed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Simon
Add to List
