"For a Christian, Jesus is the unique and only way that God has fully revealed himself. For a Jew this cannot be"
About this Quote
Blue’s line lands like a polite door closing: not slammed, not barricaded, just firmly shut with a hand on the handle. As a rabbi who spent decades translating faith into public language, he’s not auditioning for interfaith kumbaya. He’s naming the non-negotiable boundary that often gets papered over when “dialogue” starts sounding like a marketing slogan.
The intent is clarifying rather than conciliatory. Christianity, at its doctrinal core, stakes a claim on Jesus as the decisive disclosure of God’s nature and will. Blue doesn’t caricature that; he states it cleanly, almost generously. Then comes the pivot: “For a Jew this cannot be.” The sentence is blunt, but the bluntness is ethical. It refuses the common interfaith trick of turning difference into mere “emphasis,” as if centuries of theology can be reduced to a polite disagreement about style.
The subtext is double-edged. On one side, it’s a defense of Jewish integrity: Judaism cannot accept an “only way” that reroutes God’s self-revelation through Christ without ceasing to be Judaism. On the other, it’s a quiet critique of Christian universalism: if your faith requires my theological surrender as the price of spiritual legitimacy, don’t call the relationship mutual respect.
Context matters: Blue spoke as a prominent British Jewish voice in a post-Holocaust, increasingly pluralist Europe where Christianity’s cultural dominance lingered even as belief waned. His sentence treats coexistence as possible, but only if both traditions stop pretending the hardest part isn’t real.
The intent is clarifying rather than conciliatory. Christianity, at its doctrinal core, stakes a claim on Jesus as the decisive disclosure of God’s nature and will. Blue doesn’t caricature that; he states it cleanly, almost generously. Then comes the pivot: “For a Jew this cannot be.” The sentence is blunt, but the bluntness is ethical. It refuses the common interfaith trick of turning difference into mere “emphasis,” as if centuries of theology can be reduced to a polite disagreement about style.
The subtext is double-edged. On one side, it’s a defense of Jewish integrity: Judaism cannot accept an “only way” that reroutes God’s self-revelation through Christ without ceasing to be Judaism. On the other, it’s a quiet critique of Christian universalism: if your faith requires my theological surrender as the price of spiritual legitimacy, don’t call the relationship mutual respect.
Context matters: Blue spoke as a prominent British Jewish voice in a post-Holocaust, increasingly pluralist Europe where Christianity’s cultural dominance lingered even as belief waned. His sentence treats coexistence as possible, but only if both traditions stop pretending the hardest part isn’t real.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Lionel
Add to List


