"For a woman to consider a financial question was shuddered over as a profanity"
About this Quote
Woodhull’s specific intent is to expose how financial ignorance was not an accident of “separate spheres” etiquette but an enforced vulnerability. If women are discouraged from asking about wages, property, debt, or investment, they’re easier to manage in marriage, easier to underpay at work, and easier to shame when they fail. The line reads like a diagnosis of an ideology that survives by making practical questions feel unladylike, then calling the resulting dependence “virtue.”
Context matters: Woodhull moved in the volatile post-Civil War world of suffrage agitation, labor unrest, and scandals that blurred sex, power, and commerce. She was one of the first women to publicly insist that politics and money were inseparable from “women’s rights.” The brilliance of the phrasing is that it doesn’t plead for inclusion; it mocks the taboo itself, showing how absurd it is that arithmetic could be treated like blasphemy.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Woodhull, Victoria. (2026, January 16). For a woman to consider a financial question was shuddered over as a profanity. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/for-a-woman-to-consider-a-financial-question-was-92459/
Chicago Style
Woodhull, Victoria. "For a woman to consider a financial question was shuddered over as a profanity." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/for-a-woman-to-consider-a-financial-question-was-92459/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"For a woman to consider a financial question was shuddered over as a profanity." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/for-a-woman-to-consider-a-financial-question-was-92459/. Accessed 18 Feb. 2026.





