"For both reasons, owing to the thermal motion and to the working together of various wavelengths, factors arise which, in a similar manner to the structural factor, exert some influence upon the brightness of the interference points but not upon their location"
About this Quote
Von Laue is doing something deceptively radical here: stripping away the romance of “spots on a screen” and insisting on a hierarchy of causes. In early X-ray crystallography, the dazzling interference pattern could tempt you to treat every visible feature as equally meaningful. He draws a line. Thermal motion and mixed wavelengths matter, but they matter in a very particular way: they modulate intensity, not geometry. The interference points stay put; what changes is how loudly they announce themselves.
That distinction is the quote’s real intent. Location encodes the crystal’s underlying periodicity, the hard architectural information. Brightness is temperament: the lattice’s jitter (atoms vibrating from heat) and the messiness of real radiation (a spread of wavelengths) smear or dampen the signal. Von Laue’s phrasing reads like a careful defense against misinterpretation: don’t mistake a dim spot for a missing structure, or a bright one for extra order. The pattern’s map is robust; the contrast is contingent.
The subtext is methodological authority. He’s building a scientific etiquette for a new instrument of seeing: which features deserve to be trusted as structural truth, and which are environmental noise riding on top of it. Historically, this lands in the aftermath of his 1912 breakthrough showing X-rays diffract through crystals, when the field had to convert uncanny images into reliable measurements. The sentence is dry by design; it’s a warning label in prose, anchoring a young technique to physical first principles.
That distinction is the quote’s real intent. Location encodes the crystal’s underlying periodicity, the hard architectural information. Brightness is temperament: the lattice’s jitter (atoms vibrating from heat) and the messiness of real radiation (a spread of wavelengths) smear or dampen the signal. Von Laue’s phrasing reads like a careful defense against misinterpretation: don’t mistake a dim spot for a missing structure, or a bright one for extra order. The pattern’s map is robust; the contrast is contingent.
The subtext is methodological authority. He’s building a scientific etiquette for a new instrument of seeing: which features deserve to be trusted as structural truth, and which are environmental noise riding on top of it. Historically, this lands in the aftermath of his 1912 breakthrough showing X-rays diffract through crystals, when the field had to convert uncanny images into reliable measurements. The sentence is dry by design; it’s a warning label in prose, anchoring a young technique to physical first principles.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Max
Add to List
