"For me the most moving moment came when I first started working on 2001. I was already in awe of him, and he had very much already become Stanley Kubrick by the time the film started"
About this Quote
A peculiar kind of humility runs through Dullea's recollection: the emotional peak of working on 2001 isn't a premiere, an applause line, or even a scene that "lands". It's the moment before the machinery really starts, when he realizes he's stepping into someone else's gravity. That choice of "most moving" is telling. He frames awe as the primary feeling, not artistry or ambition, which quietly reverses the usual actor narrative of self-mythmaking.
The line "he had very much already become Stanley Kubrick" does two things at once. On the surface it's praise, a recognition that Kubrick arrived on set with a fully formed reputation. Underneath, it's a subtle description of power. Kubrick isn't just a director; he's a finished brand, a figure with an aura that reorganizes everyone else in the room. Dullea suggests that Kubrick's identity was already fixed, even as the film itself was still unmade. That's the asymmetry: the movie is in flux, the man is not.
Context matters here because 2001 is now treated like a monument, but Dullea is pointing to the moment the monument was still wet cement. He's admitting that the mythology preceded the proof. The awe isn't retrospective; it's present tense, lived in real time, which helps explain the famously controlled, sometimes intimidating set culture around Kubrick. Dullea's phrasing makes the actor's role clear: not co-author, not collaborator, but witness to a director whose legend functioned like a script everyone was already reading from.
The line "he had very much already become Stanley Kubrick" does two things at once. On the surface it's praise, a recognition that Kubrick arrived on set with a fully formed reputation. Underneath, it's a subtle description of power. Kubrick isn't just a director; he's a finished brand, a figure with an aura that reorganizes everyone else in the room. Dullea suggests that Kubrick's identity was already fixed, even as the film itself was still unmade. That's the asymmetry: the movie is in flux, the man is not.
Context matters here because 2001 is now treated like a monument, but Dullea is pointing to the moment the monument was still wet cement. He's admitting that the mythology preceded the proof. The awe isn't retrospective; it's present tense, lived in real time, which helps explain the famously controlled, sometimes intimidating set culture around Kubrick. Dullea's phrasing makes the actor's role clear: not co-author, not collaborator, but witness to a director whose legend functioned like a script everyone was already reading from.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Keir
Add to List


