"For months it seemed that a revolution was certain. But instead, slavery seems more likely now. The working class no longer has the physical resistance for a revolution, and the Entente is too strong, and Russia is too weak"
About this Quote
Hope collapses here with the bluntness of a field report. Smedley is writing from inside a moment when history felt pliable, when “for months” the future seemed to be tilting toward rupture. Then she snaps the lens tighter: not just the revolution failing, but its opposite hardening into place. “Slavery” isn’t rhetorical excess so much as a diagnosis of what happens when mass politics loses its body. She measures revolution in “physical resistance” - endurance, hunger tolerance, the capacity to strike and fight and keep showing up. That phrasing refuses romantic notions of uprising as pure willpower. People can be right and still be worn down.
The subtext is a cold inventory of forces that don’t care about moral clarity. The Entente, shorthand for the victorious World War I powers and their postwar leverage, stands in for external pressure: money, blockades, military intervention, diplomatic isolation. Against that, “Russia is too weak” reads like a warning about revolutionary overreliance on a fragile homeland. If the supposed center can’t supply material support or strategic confidence, the periphery fractures into resignation.
Smedley’s intent is to puncture the intoxicating narrative of inevitability that often surrounds revolutionary talk. She’s also, quietly, indicting the way international power can domesticate revolt: exhaust the working class, fortify the winners, and then call the resulting order “stability.” The line doesn’t mourn a missed utopia; it catalogs how quickly a near-revolution can become a managed descent into coercion.
The subtext is a cold inventory of forces that don’t care about moral clarity. The Entente, shorthand for the victorious World War I powers and their postwar leverage, stands in for external pressure: money, blockades, military intervention, diplomatic isolation. Against that, “Russia is too weak” reads like a warning about revolutionary overreliance on a fragile homeland. If the supposed center can’t supply material support or strategic confidence, the periphery fractures into resignation.
Smedley’s intent is to puncture the intoxicating narrative of inevitability that often surrounds revolutionary talk. She’s also, quietly, indicting the way international power can domesticate revolt: exhaust the working class, fortify the winners, and then call the resulting order “stability.” The line doesn’t mourn a missed utopia; it catalogs how quickly a near-revolution can become a managed descent into coercion.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Agnes
Add to List





