"For this reason, strangers are not really conceived as individuals, but as strangers of a particular type: the element of distance is no less general in regard to them than the element of nearness"
About this Quote
Strangers, in Simmel's hands, are less people than positions in a social map. His point isn’t that we fail to notice individuality; it’s that society actively needs a category called “the stranger” to function. We file newcomers into types because types are cognitively efficient and politically useful: they let a group decide, quickly, who counts, who can be trusted, who can be traded with, who can be blamed. The “distance” Simmel names isn’t just physical or emotional. It’s the social distance that comes from weak ties, limited shared history, and uncertain obligations. That distance is “general” because it attaches to the role itself, regardless of the person occupying it.
The sly power of the line is its balancing act: nearness and distance aren’t opposites here but coexisting conditions. Strangers can be in your neighborhood, your workplace, your family-by-marriage; they can be intimate in proximity and still structurally remote. That’s why “the stranger” becomes a lightning rod in modern life. In the city and the market - the worlds Simmel studied as signatures of modernity - strangers are everywhere, and interaction depends on impersonal scripts: money, bureaucracy, etiquette. You can be “near” enough to transact, collaborate, even desire, while remaining “far” enough to be denied full moral membership.
Subtext: the comfort of categorizing strangers is a kind of social self-defense, but it’s also an alibi. Once someone is a “type,” empathy becomes optional. Simmel is diagnosing how modern societies build belonging by manufacturing distance, then calling it common sense.
The sly power of the line is its balancing act: nearness and distance aren’t opposites here but coexisting conditions. Strangers can be in your neighborhood, your workplace, your family-by-marriage; they can be intimate in proximity and still structurally remote. That’s why “the stranger” becomes a lightning rod in modern life. In the city and the market - the worlds Simmel studied as signatures of modernity - strangers are everywhere, and interaction depends on impersonal scripts: money, bureaucracy, etiquette. You can be “near” enough to transact, collaborate, even desire, while remaining “far” enough to be denied full moral membership.
Subtext: the comfort of categorizing strangers is a kind of social self-defense, but it’s also an alibi. Once someone is a “type,” empathy becomes optional. Simmel is diagnosing how modern societies build belonging by manufacturing distance, then calling it common sense.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|---|
| Source | Georg Simmel, "The Stranger" (Der Fremde), essay originally 1908; English translation commonly found in On Individuality and Social Forms, ed. Donald N. Levine, University of Chicago Press, 1971. |
More Quotes by Georg
Add to List









