"For touching an adversary's man, when it cannot be captured, the offender must move his King"
About this Quote
That’s the point. It’s not simply about legality, it’s about disciplining impulse. The hand reaches before the mind has verified. The penalty forces you into the most politically costly kind of move: a king move is often defensive, awkward, revealing. In a culture obsessed with gentlemanly conduct, “offender” is doing a lot of work; it turns a slip of technique into a breach of character. The board becomes a courtroom. Your mistake isn’t corrected; it’s memorialized.
Context matters here. Staunton wasn’t merely a player but a public authority shaping how modern chess should be played and talked about. Mid-19th-century chess culture was codifying norms for clubs, matches, and spectators; standardizing rules was also standardizing virtue. His wording performs that authority: crisp, legalistic, unembarrassed about coercion. Subtext: mastery isn’t just seeing combinations, it’s governing yourself. And if you can’t, the game will make you show it, with your King stepping forward to pay for your wandering hand.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sports |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Staunton, Howard. (2026, January 18). For touching an adversary's man, when it cannot be captured, the offender must move his King. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/for-touching-an-adversarys-man-when-it-cannot-be-12005/
Chicago Style
Staunton, Howard. "For touching an adversary's man, when it cannot be captured, the offender must move his King." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/for-touching-an-adversarys-man-when-it-cannot-be-12005/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"For touching an adversary's man, when it cannot be captured, the offender must move his King." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/for-touching-an-adversarys-man-when-it-cannot-be-12005/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.













