"For what I wrote that started this whole controversy, I deserved to be criticized, and I felt bad about writing it. I felt bad mainly as a writer and a thinker"
About this Quote
A smart apology that still keeps the author’s ego on a short leash. Easterbrook doesn’t fight the premise that he earned backlash; he leans into it. “I deserved to be criticized” is a disarming sentence because it preempts the familiar culture-war script where the accused reframes accountability as persecution. He grants the public its right to judge him, then shifts the emotional register from injury to craft.
The real tell is what he says hurt: not the professional fallout, not the reputational damage, not even the people he may have harmed. He “felt bad mainly as a writer and a thinker.” That’s not nothing; it signals a belief that the core failure was intellectual and rhetorical. The subtext is a kind of newsroom-era creed: ideas have standards, words have consequences, and the deepest shame is producing work that doesn’t meet the bar. It’s contrition, but it’s also an attempt to locate the controversy inside his own discipline, where he has authority to diagnose the problem.
Contextually, this is the post-controversy posture common to public intellectuals who want to keep writing for mainstream venues: concede error without surrendering identity. By centering the apology on the craft, he invites readers to see him as corrigible rather than condemnable. It’s a bid to stay in the conversation by reframing the scandal as a lapse in judgment and execution - a writer’s failure - rather than a window into character.
The real tell is what he says hurt: not the professional fallout, not the reputational damage, not even the people he may have harmed. He “felt bad mainly as a writer and a thinker.” That’s not nothing; it signals a belief that the core failure was intellectual and rhetorical. The subtext is a kind of newsroom-era creed: ideas have standards, words have consequences, and the deepest shame is producing work that doesn’t meet the bar. It’s contrition, but it’s also an attempt to locate the controversy inside his own discipline, where he has authority to diagnose the problem.
Contextually, this is the post-controversy posture common to public intellectuals who want to keep writing for mainstream venues: concede error without surrendering identity. By centering the apology on the craft, he invites readers to see him as corrigible rather than condemnable. It’s a bid to stay in the conversation by reframing the scandal as a lapse in judgment and execution - a writer’s failure - rather than a window into character.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Gregg
Add to List
