"Forcing women in or near land combat will hurt recruiting, not help"
About this Quote
Schlafly’s sentence is engineered to sound like sober personnel policy while smuggling in a cultural verdict about gender. “Forcing” does the heavy lifting: it casts any move toward integrating women into combat roles as coercion, an imposition by elites on an otherwise healthy institution. The phrase “in or near” is a neat rhetorical expansion, turning a concrete debate (frontline assignments) into a slippery slope where almost any military job can be framed as dangerously close to the forbidden zone. She’s not arguing about battlefield efficacy so much as policing boundaries.
The stated worry is recruiting: a supposedly objective metric, conveniently market-flavored and hard to disprove in real time. But the subtext is older and sharper: men won’t enlist if the military stops reassuring them that it remains a masculine proving ground, with women positioned as dependents to be protected, not peers to fight alongside. Recruiting becomes a proxy for morale, and morale becomes a proxy for gender order.
Context matters. Schlafly built a career resisting second-wave feminism and the Equal Rights Amendment, often by recasting equality as social chaos. In the late Cold War and post-Vietnam era, the U.S. military was both professionalizing and renegotiating its image; combat exclusion was one of the clearest symbolic lines. Her quote exploits that moment, translating a cultural anxiety into a pragmatic-sounding warning. It works because it borrows the language of institutional success while defending a hierarchy it doesn’t name.
The stated worry is recruiting: a supposedly objective metric, conveniently market-flavored and hard to disprove in real time. But the subtext is older and sharper: men won’t enlist if the military stops reassuring them that it remains a masculine proving ground, with women positioned as dependents to be protected, not peers to fight alongside. Recruiting becomes a proxy for morale, and morale becomes a proxy for gender order.
Context matters. Schlafly built a career resisting second-wave feminism and the Equal Rights Amendment, often by recasting equality as social chaos. In the late Cold War and post-Vietnam era, the U.S. military was both professionalizing and renegotiating its image; combat exclusion was one of the clearest symbolic lines. Her quote exploits that moment, translating a cultural anxiety into a pragmatic-sounding warning. It works because it borrows the language of institutional success while defending a hierarchy it doesn’t name.
Quote Details
| Topic | Military & Soldier |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Phyllis
Add to List





