"Forcing women in or near land combat will hurt recruiting, not help"
About this Quote
The stated worry is recruiting: a supposedly objective metric, conveniently market-flavored and hard to disprove in real time. But the subtext is older and sharper: men won’t enlist if the military stops reassuring them that it remains a masculine proving ground, with women positioned as dependents to be protected, not peers to fight alongside. Recruiting becomes a proxy for morale, and morale becomes a proxy for gender order.
Context matters. Schlafly built a career resisting second-wave feminism and the Equal Rights Amendment, often by recasting equality as social chaos. In the late Cold War and post-Vietnam era, the U.S. military was both professionalizing and renegotiating its image; combat exclusion was one of the clearest symbolic lines. Her quote exploits that moment, translating a cultural anxiety into a pragmatic-sounding warning. It works because it borrows the language of institutional success while defending a hierarchy it doesn’t name.
Quote Details
| Topic | Military & Soldier |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Schlafly, Phyllis. (2026, January 15). Forcing women in or near land combat will hurt recruiting, not help. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/forcing-women-in-or-near-land-combat-will-hurt-166486/
Chicago Style
Schlafly, Phyllis. "Forcing women in or near land combat will hurt recruiting, not help." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/forcing-women-in-or-near-land-combat-will-hurt-166486/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Forcing women in or near land combat will hurt recruiting, not help." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/forcing-women-in-or-near-land-combat-will-hurt-166486/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2026.







