"Fox News is hated because they're elitists, and the worst winners television's ever seen"
About this Quote
Olbermann’s line lands like a thrown chair: it’s less a critique of Fox’s ideology than a character indictment. Calling them “elitists” is deliberate jujitsu. Fox built a brand on anti-elite posture, so the charge flips their self-myth inside out: you can posture as populist while still sneering from the balcony. In Olbermann’s framing, Fox’s offense isn’t merely conservative bias; it’s the satisfaction of believing you’re winning and wanting everyone else to taste it.
“The worst winners television’s ever seen” is a sportswriter’s insult smuggled into media criticism, and that’s not accidental. Olbermann came up in sports and performs politics with the same grammar: rivalry, scoreboards, humiliation, postgame swagger. The phrase “worst winners” also sketches a broader cultural complaint about the mid-2000s cable-news era, when networks stopped acting like referees and started acting like teams. If you’re a “winner,” you need an enemy to stay a winner, so the broadcast becomes a perpetual victory lap that depends on someone else’s defeat.
The subtext is personal and structural at once. Olbermann is not pretending neutrality; he’s counter-programming. His “elitists” is aimed at Fox’s audience, offering them permission to dislike Fox not for what it argues, but for how it argues: with contempt, certainty, and a kind of triumphal glee. Hatred, in this telling, isn’t ideological intolerance; it’s a reaction to being condescended to by people who insist they’re “just telling it like it is.”
“The worst winners television’s ever seen” is a sportswriter’s insult smuggled into media criticism, and that’s not accidental. Olbermann came up in sports and performs politics with the same grammar: rivalry, scoreboards, humiliation, postgame swagger. The phrase “worst winners” also sketches a broader cultural complaint about the mid-2000s cable-news era, when networks stopped acting like referees and started acting like teams. If you’re a “winner,” you need an enemy to stay a winner, so the broadcast becomes a perpetual victory lap that depends on someone else’s defeat.
The subtext is personal and structural at once. Olbermann is not pretending neutrality; he’s counter-programming. His “elitists” is aimed at Fox’s audience, offering them permission to dislike Fox not for what it argues, but for how it argues: with contempt, certainty, and a kind of triumphal glee. Hatred, in this telling, isn’t ideological intolerance; it’s a reaction to being condescended to by people who insist they’re “just telling it like it is.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Savage |
|---|
More Quotes by Keith
Add to List


